Analysis: Presidential candidate Barack Obama uttered the words that finally placed his true perspective in public. He said, “I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” That is what is called “redistribution of wealth” a foundation of socialism. Note that the only difference between socialism and communism is that communists put military on the streets where socialists indoctrinate your children. Thus, the truth of Obama’s much heralded “change” is to end America’s representative form of government in favor of Big Mamma government – she can care for us all.
This type of change is something socialists have been working to accomplish for generations. They have said so in our offices and homes. They are protected within American academia. They dominate traditional media and hold overwhelming influence with Hollywood. They hate America because history proves traditional American values are successful whereas every socialist system has failed or is failing.
Obama is buying the election in part with what is identified as $426.9 million from small donors whose names Obama will not disclose (click here for more). An analyst for the Federal Election Commission is urging a full investigation including “millions of dollars of illegal foreign donations” (click here for more).
The McCain campaign has made its complete donor database available online; the Obama campaign has not identified donors for nearly half the amount he has raised, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).
Obama’s oft touted experience as a community organizer is from his work with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). He was their lawyer and a trainer. Obama hired them to work for his campaign and they are under felony investigations in more than a dozen states for illegal voter registrations. This qualifies as organized crime and betrays the entire election system and the sanctity of the election process. It should fall within the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act.
Oklahoma Congressman Tom Cole recently wrote, “In Nevada it has been revealed that ACORN hired inmates in the state penitentiary to register new voters. They registered the Dallas Cowboys to vote in Nevada. Another Nevada canvasser was caught filling out voter registration forms using names and addresses copied out of the telephone book. Needless to say, this scandal is not confined to Nevada. Election officials in Ohio, Missouri, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and New Mexico have all uncovered similar instances of fraud. A state prosecutor in Washington State put it very well when he described the activities of ACORN as ‘an act of vandalism against our voter rolls.’
“Voting in free and fair elections is the very foundation of our system of self governance. Who can ever forget the remarkable election of 2000 when the candidate who actually received fewer popular votes won the election? This was after an extended recount – in the state [where] his bother served as Governor – and a 5-4 Supreme Court decision. Yet at no time did we see tanks rolling through the streets. There was no martial law. Americans tuned into the Tonight Show every night to see Jay Leno cracking jokes about hanging chads. This was possible because Americans had faith that despite the problems we had in that election, the process was fundamentally honest and fair. Organizations like ACORN undermine that trust and as a result they undermine the very political stability of the United States,” Congressman Cole added.
Further, Barack Obama’s first campaign “meet and greet” was held in the home of admitted terrorist William Ayers. Ayers sought to overthrow the American government by force (the communist approach) which failed. Then, with his wife and fellow terrorist, Bernardine Dohrn, began the more subtle “indoctrinate the children” effort that continues today.
Every political candidate at every level of political service is well aware of the political background and influence of people who host “meet and greets.” Those functions raise money for political campaigns. An analysis of the host’s influence is an important part of the decision to hold the event – especially when launching the first of such gatherings. That Obama would deny such careful consideration of his function at the Ayers home is an obvious lie, but not the first old friend he has thrown under the high-speed advance of his ambitions.
Obama’s decades of association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago also becomes highly relevant in the socialist context. Wright hates America, promotes Black superiority (rather than equality) and preaches an unchristian “revolution theology” of marginal intellectual and no theological accuracy. Click here for outrageous comments from Wright and click here for his defense of those comments at the National Press Club.
At the National Press Club one questioner asked Wright, “Do Christians and Muslims both go to heaven?” Wright answered, “All God’s children go to heaven.” That position is not Christian or Muslim. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6) and the first of the primary ritual requirements of Islam (arkan ad-din) demands Muslims sincerely utter the creed, “There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger” (shahada).
Preaching both are equal is Universalism or Unitarian, but it is not Christian or Muslim. Sadly, national traditional media missed that or have not gathered the brass to ask Obama the same question asked his preacher; the man that married Obama, baptized his children, and served as mentor for multiple decades or until Wright became a political liability.
Maybe Obama is just using whatever religion is handy whenever and however long as it is helpful to his career. Most socialists despise faith and the faithful of any religion and blame both for evil in the world – they typically worship government to achive the “Socialist Utopia.” Of course they fail to recognize that the most deadly governments and leaders have been atheists.
While conservatives can rightly question Republicans who voted to allow the recent Federal financial bailout as tilting socialist – that was a temporary emergency funding effort to stabilize credit availability. The root cause of that disaster is government policy which pushed lenders since 1995 to provide “Subprime” loans to people who could not and should not have qualified otherwise. Add predator lending with greedy fraud and presto – welcome to a financial crisis. Government regulation by Congress failed.
Both parties are responsible to some degree, but Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lived the good life under government regulation because the Democrat Party wanted it that way. Democrats – including Barrack Obama – and their campaign contributors profited. Republicans complained – especially that historically rebellious reformer Senator John McCain. (Click here for “Fed and fraud fails financials.”)
Is the recent financial crisis solely America’s fault? Of course not, we have been told for years that we now live in a “global economy.” Is it possible that global financiers like convicted criminal George Soros (Insider Trading: France 2002) a socialist, who is funding moveon.org and other extreme politically-manipulative groups are moving money for a purpose? Is it possible that foreign governments or terrorists are manipulating the financial markets to promote this crisis helpful to the candidate closest to their philosophy and one much more willing to “talk without preconditions?”
Soros was an early fan of Obama and for good reason. Barack (using his legal middle name is racist) Obama is the most socialist US Senator in history. Why has Obama never released his birth certificate? William Owens writes, “Barack Hussein Obama is half-white from his mother’s side, but 43.75% Arab from his father’s side (his father was 87.5% Arab and 12.5% African Negro). Barack (which in Arabic means “blessed”) is only 6.25% African Negro. Perhaps this is why the Obama campaign refuses to release his birth certificate.” (click here for more).
In “Obama fails the first questions” published May 12, I wrote, “No one should ever want anyone to come from nowhere to become President of the United States of America. Not from the Left. Not from the right. Vetting a candidate is the purpose of this public spectacle and very important as once elected; it takes four years to get them out of office.”
American should ask questions and be critical of “glittering generalities” within the answers, but when Samuel “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher walked outside his home in the Springfield Township to ask about tax proposals, Obama said, “It’s not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody that is behind you, that they have a chance for success, too. I think that when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
Punishing success is exactly what Obama will do. Raising taxes during troubled economic times is exactly what Obama will do without restraint with a “super majority” of Democrats in Congress which is guaranteed to drive the economy into a depression as history proves. President Herbert Hoover tried to combat the Great Depression with higher taxes and volunteer efforts and government action, none of which produced economic recovery during his term.
Obama says he will give a tax break to 95 percent of Americans, but 40 percent of Americans don’t pay taxes. That means those people will be getting direct payments from the government – that is called welfare, the dole, or, in short, socialism.
Government doesn’t make money. Individuals make money. Government only has the money it takes from people by force of law – seizures by physical force if necessary. If we cannot keep what we earn from our labors – why labor in the first place? Didn’t the Soviet Union prove that point?
As Dr. Eugene Narrett, PhD wrote, “As it grows more unjust, a culture lives by the official lies it tells itself and teaches or imposes on its people that make its injustice look like ‘equity,’ its ferocity, compassion, that terms its diminishing batch of permitted opinions, ‘diversity;’ its oppressive and pitiless prejudices, ‘tolerance,’ and so on. The song of a cynical cult of power is a lullaby of lies.”
Wurzelbacher nailed it – Obama’s most significant statement. Funny, but rather than celebrate or even admit Joe found what traditional media had failed to discover of the candidate’s true nature, the media went on attack against him – a regular “Joe.” What a circus of fools with “thrill going up [their] leg” as the clown Chris Matthews said.
Thanks Joe, Americans are smarter now – assuming enough of them are awake.
About the author:David Arnett began his career in professional journalism in 1985 and has published Tulsa Today since 1996 – before Al Gore invented the Internet. He has won two national awards as a First Amendment Publisher. Arnett is an idea guy, a Constitutional Republican, a Conservative Media Critic and a proud pain in the political derriere of the disingenuous.
This analysis may be reproduced without charge with proper attribution and links to the original source. Arnett is available for interview by recognized media.