Category Archives: Tulsa Speaks

Trends suggest “Greatest Depression”

Analysis:  The wealth of plain, hard facts belies lofty promises made by President Obama’s first address to Congress.

"We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before," said President Obama.

Not anytime soon.  The government has yet to fix the levees in New Orleans.  There is still a hole in the ground where the World Trade Center once stood.  Washington has started two wars it can’t win and doesn’t know how to finish.  The massive bank, brokerage, auto and insurance company bailouts have done nothing to resuscitate the sinking economy.  The Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) that candidate Obama championed has not "relieved."  President Obama’s $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will not lead to recovery and the nation will not ’emerge stronger than before.
Distinguished Men and Women

With only a succession of past Executive and Congressional failures to point to, and with the same people responsible for those failures still holding high office, the belief that this time around it will be miraculously different is nothing less than willful delusion.

Tuesday’s episode of The Presidential Reality Show was a prime time exercise in human debasement and self-humiliation.  Some low lights: Congressman Eliot Engel (D-NY) arrived at 8:30 a.m. to secure a prized spot on the House floor for a chance to shake the President’s hand on his way to the stage.  "It’s a special treat for me to do it this year," Engel said, adding, "It’s the office, it’s the aura … but it’s also the man."

Shiny Cabinet members and august Supreme Court justices were announced in stentorian tones by a pair of Sergeants-at-Arms with all the exaggerated pomp of a Groucho Marx send-up of British royalty.

And, to punctuate the performance, there was the geriatric pom-pom girl, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, repeatedly jumping from her seat, leading her pack of Democratic trained seals in whoops of applause at every repetition of the magic juju words: "Jobs!" "Prosperity!" "Confidence!"

Across the aisle, Republicans smirked, mugged and scowled darkly, in their new roles as minority villains.  Few GOP hands clapped.

That the public as well as the press should take this three-ring spectacle seriously is as depressing an indication of the state of the nation as the empty rhetoric of the speech itself.

Meanwhile, back on the planet, in the midst of a global economic crisis, the public continues to pin its hopes on a President, Senators and Congressmen willingly participating in such obviously orchestrated buffoonery.  How is this even possible?  How is such behavior tolerated?  Why would anyone look up to these people?

In one sense it is understandable: President Obama’s big show was just another typical political performance.  From the excesses of Democratic and Republican nominating conventions, to photo ops of candidates sitting on bales of hay pretending they’re just plain folks, to staging whistle stops from vintage trains dragged out of storage especially for the occasion, to contrived Town Hall meetings, to the slick and vicious marketing campaigns … the public has come to accept such antics as "normal."

These political rituals, carefully staged, time-tested and proven, create an illusion of superiority.  President Obama made the distinction clear in Tuesday’s speech:  "I have come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women of this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here."

"Distinguished?"  Distinguished for what?  Having the skills to do whatever they have to do – no matter how ruthless or degrading – to win elections?  Yet, the honorific is accepted without question while the implicit patronization of the citizenry slips by unperceived.  They are "distinguished" and the rest are merely the "men and women who sent them there."
Con Game

This is a confidence game.  The elaborate staging is designed to inspire the nation’s people with "confidence" that their distinguished leaders have the skills to save them from an economic disaster that both political parties were instrumental in creating.

Days earlier, former President Bill Clinton urged the new President to play the confidence game.  "I just want the American people to know that he’s confident that we are gonna get out of this and he feels good about the long run," and that President Obama "… is hopeful and completely convinced we’re gonna come through this," Clinton said on national TV.

"Completely convinced" or not, in his speech, the newly elected President pitched "confidence," repeating the word seven times.  It worked.  Post speech polls, the pundits and the press gave the President high marks for his performance.  And President Obama, the most distinguished among all those "distinguished men and women of this great chamber," established his credentials as America’s Confidence-Man-in-Chief.

Trendpost: What is a Confidence Man and what makes us say President Obama is conning the public?  A con man succeeds by gaining the confidence of the victim.  In this case the victim is the taxpayer who is being shaken down for trillions to bail out "too big to fail" businesses.  The con lies in Obama’s assurance "… while the cost of action will be great, I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater."

The trillions already spent on bailouts and buyouts make it clear "the cost of action will be great."  It is already great, and it has failed miserably.  Why should anyone believe that pouring still more trillions into the same bottomless pit will now, somehow, prove effective?

And why should anyone believe Obama’s assurance that the "cost of inaction will be far greater"?  He doesn’t know that.  Why believe the assurance of the man who failed to recognize the country was in recession until eight months after the recession began?

We forecast the recession well before it happened.  We are forecasting "The Greatest Depression."  And having analyzed Mr. Obama’s speech, promises and plans, we can forecast, with assurance of our own, that the cost of action will prove far greater than the cost of inaction.

While the public, both at home and abroad, express high hopes and great optimism, the global financial markets remain un-assured by assurances and continue to reach new lows.

Trendpost: President Obama’s $3.6 trillion budget and the additional trillions earmarked for stimulus packages and further bailouts may provide temporary relief, but will ultimately destroy the value of the US dollar.  The global financial system is in collapse.  And neither stimulus nor spending packages will reverse it.  We remain bullish on gold and stand by our prediction of gold at $2000 per ounce.  


About the author:
Gerald Celente, a Close Combat practitioner and black belt trainer, well understands the importance of proacting rather than reacting: "The first rule of Close Combat is to attack the attacker. Action is faster than reaction. The same holds true for the future. You know the future is coming … attack it before it attacks you."

Founder of The Trends Research Institute in 1980, Gerald Celente is a pioneer trend strategist. He is author of the national bestseller Trends 2000 and Trend Tracking (Warner Books) – "Far better than Megatrends," and publisher of the internationally circulated Trends Journal newsletter.

Celente is a political atheist. Unencumbered by political dogma, rigid ideology or conventional wisdom, his motto is "think for yourself," observes and analyzes the current events forming future trends for what they are – not for the way he wants them to be.

Like a doctor giving a diagnosis after gathering the facts, whether or not you like the prognosis doesn’t alter the outcome, make him an optimist or pessimist – it’s simply what is.  And while Celente holds a US passport, he considers himself a citizen of the world. Celente has earned his reputation as "The most trusted name in trends" by accurately forecasting hundreds of social, business, consumer, environmental, economic, political, entertainment, technology trends, etc. Among them:
*  Celente coined the term "clean foods," in 1993 and predicted sustained growth in organic products in 1988.
*  When gold was at $275 per ounce in 2002, Celente said the price had bottomed and in 2004 forecast the beginning of the "Gold Bull Run." Since that time, with pinpoint accuracy, he said when, why – and how high – gold would go.
Years before Starbucks was a household name, Celente forecast the popularity of gourmet coffee and decades before Pepsi and Coke got into the water business he predicted the "Big Boom in Bottled Water."
*  On the geopolitical and economic fronts, Celente and The Trends Research Institute are credited with forecasting many major trends, including the collapse of the Soviet Union, the last two recessions, the dot-com meltdown, the 1997 Asian currency crisis, the 1987 world stock market crash, increased terrorism against America, "Crusades 2000," and Iraq … before war began.

Executive Encephalitis

Analysis: Like newly pubescent teens stumbling drunk in a cheap whorehouse with their parent’s credit cards, the US Congress is buying everything without regard to the health, protection, or the financial survival of taxpayers.  The stimulus package will not stimulate and may well decimate the economy of America.

 

Congress first failed to regulate government housing programs (although
clearly warned) which began the current economic crisis.  Then the first
stimulus package last year failed to accomplish any lasting economic
boost.  Then Congress stampeded President Bush into the foolish Troubled
Assets Relief Program (TARP) now discovered to have wasted over $78
BILLION
(strike two on the Constitutional responsibility of Congress
as good fiscal stewards).  Next auto makers supported by corrupt unions
pandered for $17.4 billion to continue failed inefficiencies.  Now, the
non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reports the stimulus bill will
harm our economy and cause our Gross Domestic Product to decrease over
the long term. 

Where is the responsibility?  If taxpayers must mortgage their grandchildren’s future to pay for irresponsible, inattentive or fraudulent oversight within various institutions, then public inquiries must be required.  Without it, this is not change.  This is a crazy left turn to policies of socialism that have failed at every time and in every country throughout history including our own.

President Obama campaigned on pure personality and glittering generalities, therefore, the only change voters approved was a different persona in office.  We did not vote on this Socialist/Marxist takeover of private business – yes, I know this site warned you, but most other media did not. 

Author Paul Davidson has included a revealing note in his book on growing up in Oklahoma during the Great Depression.  Davidson reports workers called the Works Progress Administration (WPA) the “We Piddle Around.”  Government has never been efficient in such programs – see the former Soviet Union for more detail.  Yes, “bricks and mortar” projects were completed – at triple the costs over ten times the time a private company could build the same.

Oklahoma Senator Dr. Tom Coburn said, “The concerns that many members of Congress have expressed about this bill are not based on the failed policies of the past but sobering facts of present and the future.  As the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has stated, this bill will not work.  In fact, this bill will hurt our economy.  A majority of Americans also do not believe this bill will work because they possess a level of common sense that does not exist in Washington.

“Congress and the president have a choice, Dr. Coburn continued.  “They can pull this bill and fix it, or they can ram it through and claim victory.  Republicans and the Bush administration faced, and failed, this test many times.  For years, Republicans passed bloated and reckless spending bills that were harmful to the economy.  Yet, even as Republicans grew the government they touted their bills as sound and fiscally responsible vehicles for job creation.  Republican hypocrisy and spin met its logical conclusion with the most recent election.  Democrat attempts to call failures successes won’t be any more successful.  The biggest loser in this game won’t be either party, but the country.”

Common in young people new on the job, Obama has a bad case of “Executive Encephalitis” (coined here as acutely inflated inflammation of an unearned sense of self-importance).  Obama failed to produce a work product.  Obama’s staff could have drafted a stimulus plan, but instead Obama relied on Congress to write the details.  Thus without adult supervision, Democrat members retreated to the same old failed socialist programs to grow government, push pet projects and promote idiotic ideology.  Here is a clue Mr. President, you took an oath to work for all citizens not just socialists, trade unions, and welfare recipients – how about a break for people expected to pay for this largess.  

Pork details so bad that if you can read the list of projects without getting mad as hell at the waste – you need to return to high school for a basic economics class.  Sadly, we may not have the time the national media needs to get such a basic education and crawl out of the goose-stepping-tank in time.

Politico reports Sen. John McCain took his most direct shot at President Barack Obama since the presidential campaign on last Friday morning, using a Senate floor speech to criticize the president for mocking Republican concerns over the massive economic package.

“The whole point, Mr. President, is to enact tax cuts and spending measures that truly stimulate the economy,” McCain said. “There are billions and tens of billions of dollars in this bill which will have no effect within three, four, five or more years, or ever. [pause] Or ever.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told Politico that he believed Obama was "AWOL" on bipartisan negotiations on the stimulus, further showing the discontent on the GOP side of the aisle.

“$50 million in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts — all of us are for the arts,” McCain said. “Tell me how that creates any significant number of jobs?  After-school snack program is probably a good idea.  Do we really want to spend $726 million on it?”

With Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) recovering from brain cancer and the Minnesota Senate race still unresolved, Democrats have 57 seats and need to keep their caucus unified while pulling support from three GOP senators to pass the bill.

McCain rejected that strategy and said Democrats should not call the measure “bipartisan” if only a handful of Republicans support it. “You can call it an agreement, but you cannot call it a bipartisan agreement,” McCain said.

This stampede to do anything and everything throwing money with no detailed investigation, little justification and no foreseeable end while being entertained with glittering generalities of no substance without regard for the long term health of a nation has happened before in history. 

“Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circus,” wrote Roman poet Juvenal of the late 1st and early 2nd centuries.  Wikipedia reports, "

Bread and circuses" (or Bread and games) (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metaphor for handouts and petty amusements that politicians use to gain popular support, instead of gaining it through sound policy. The phrase is invoked not only to criticize politicians, but also to criticize their supporters for giving up their civic duty.

More than being criticized, future generations will damn us if we allow this to happen.  Assuming of course we and they survive the barbarians at the gates. 


About the author:

David Arnett began his career in professional journalism in 1985 and has published Tulsa Today since 1996 – before Al Gore invented the Internet.  He has won two national awards as a First Amendment Publisher.  Arnett is an idea guy, a Constitutional Republican, a Conservative Media Critic and a proud pain in the political derriere of the disingenuous. This analysis may be reproduced without charge with proper attribution and links to the original source.  Arnett is available for interview by recognized media.

 

It’s The Jews, Stupid

Editorial:  For many decades after World War II, Eastern Europe was completely Judenrein, a Nazi term meaning free of – actually rid of – Jews.  Small wonder, given that the region’s concentration camps and crematoria – Chelmno, Belzec, Treblinka, Sobibor, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Dachau, Majdanek, Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Flossenburg, Mauthausen, Ravensbruck, et al.– had incinerated millions of Jews in the Nazi’s reign of terror.  But even in the utter absence of Jews, anti-Semitism flourished!

And let’s not forget that even after the Holocaust, this intractable hatred persisted – in France, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary, the list goes on and on.  Even today, this age-old venom thrives and in many places has grown to monstrous proportions.  The same can be said of countless places on earth where no Jews have ever lived and no inhabitants of those places have ever met a Jew.

 When it comes to anti-Semitism, no first-hand experience is necessary.  All that is required is the need to vent an existential rage that seems to reside in the hearts and minds of those who desperately need a handy scapegoat for whatever pathology ails them – rationality, facts, logic and compassion be damned.  Jew hatred is a virus of unknown origin that has mutated over time into a contagious, malignant and incurable pathology, reaching its apotheosis during the Holocaust but still alive and pernicious as ever to this day.

Why is this?  Why, through millennia of worldwide crises and conflicts, has the microscopic population of Jews always been the bête-noire of public opinion?  Why, for instance, are the 1.3-billion Muslims who inhabit every continent in huge numbers so threatened by a mere 13-million Jews who live in small numbers primarily in tiny Israel and the United States?

Theories abound – this is the short list:
*  The Jews killed Christ (who even Jew-haters acknowledge was a Jewish rabbi), a canard removed from the canons of the Vatican (…not “guilty of deicide”) through the initiation of Pope John Paul XXIII in the early 1960s. But this fails to explain why so many millions of Christians are today among the most passionate friends and supporters of both Israel and the Jewish people.
*  The Jews “stole” the land of Israel from the so-called Palestinians, a “people” invented in the late 1960s by the terrorist Yasir Arafat. But this fails to explain the virulent Jew-hatred that existed in every century that preceded the twentieth.
*  The shame factor Jew haters feel that they are less resilient, less intelligent, less productive than their Semitic counterparts, and can’t explain why the vast number of Islamists – 20 percent of the world’s population – have won only seven Nobel Prizes, while the infinitesimal Jewish population – 0.02 percent – has won 129 Nobel Prizes. But this fails to explain the spectacular accomplishments of every ethnic group that has contributed to the betterment of mankind..
*  The refusal of Jews to worship any God but their own, the God that gave the world the Ten Commandments and a Code of Ethics that, to this day, all civilized nations subscribe to.
*  Both rage and envy at the notion, expressed in the Bible, that the Jews are God’s “Chosen People,” even though it fails to explain the competing claim of Muslims that Allah’s people are the chosen ones.

In her article, “Hating the Jews,” Kyle-Anne Shiver finds this last reason irresistibly compelling: “What if that tale spun in the Bible is actually true?” she asks.  “What if this one God, creator of all that is seen and all that is unseen, took it upon Himself, unbidden by humanity, to pick a people, call them His own, and then set about to reveal His own nature to them little by little, over centuries, through dire punishments and heavenly rewards and provident manna…what if these people this One God picked were the Jews?”

Shiver says what she loves about her Christian faith is that it gives her “the advantage of seeing through tangled webs of deceit, woven through many centuries and seemingly different ideologies.  My faith tells me simply that there is only one reasonable assumption on the matter of Jew hate.  It stems from God-hate…because as long as there is God, there will be Jew hatred.”

WHO HATES THE JEWS?

Among them are the many Jews who are also on the Jew-hatred bandwagon.  Without discussing self-loathing Jews like Noam Chomsky,  Norman Finkelstein, George Soros and legions of others, how to explain those other American, mostly liberal, Jews?

These are the appeasers of anti-Semites who believe – as Winston Churchill said about all appeasers – that “the crocodile will eat them last.”  While these Jews once supported Israel, their conversion from Judaism to their new religion of Liberalism – with its inflexible commitment to perceived victims – has made them look at Israel in the same negative way they look at America.

Strength is bad, these anti-establishment, anti-war leftovers from the ‘60s believe, as do older leftists.  If people suffer, it’s the fault of the establishment. If the establishment is attacked, the attackers are always right.  After all, it’s not “fair” that some people are stronger than others, even if the stronger people strive for democracy and their opponents strive for a draconian theocracy.

Having embraced not only multiculturalism and political correctness but also a perverse egalitarianism, it’s impossible for this ilk to make a value judgment about who is right or wrong, good or bad.  To them, people who seek to spread freedom and democracy and benefit the entire world by developing life-saving medicines and displaying unparalleled generosity are equal to those who strap shrapnel-laden belts on their children and burn the flags of foreign nations.  “Who are we to judge?” they bleat.

Of course, not all liberals are Jewish.  A worldwide media, comprised of non-Jews of every race, religion, and political affiliation from left to right, almost invariably militate – in their exquisitely non-objective way – against Israel, no matter the circumstances or history that compels the beleaguered state to defend itself.  Although the same media embraced the straggling remnants of the Holocaust when they landed, half dead, in the land of their ancestors and Israel became a state in 1948, their support was short-lived.

Indeed, the support from the Victims-R-Us media steadily diminished as Israel turned barren deserts into flourishing orchards, constructed gleaming cities featuring the world’s most dazzling universities and research, art and medical centers, and built a military capable of fending off – and defeating – the relentless aggression waged by Arabs in the wars of 1948-49, 1956,  1967, 1973-74, and 1982. And that is not to omit the two intifadas – in 1987-1993 and 2000 to the present – in which terrorists from Hamas and Hezbollah have sent multi-thousands of rockets and mortars into civilian centers, and also refined the art of suicide bombing.

SAME OLD – SAME OLD

In Israel’s latest defensive action against Hamas – after the terrorist group launched upwards of 10,000 rockets and mortars into Israel’s southern, civilian-populated towns and cities –  we see the same predictable scenario playing out on the world’s stage.

*  Once again, Israel accommodates her enemies by giving up land in the name of peace, as it did in 2005 by unilaterally withdrawing from the Gaza Strip and uprooting 8,000 of its residents.
*  Once again, instead of using the houses, physical-fitness facilities, fish farms, nurseries, orchards, and factories the Israelis left behind, the Arabs destroy them, showing the utter contempt they have for their own citizens.
*  Once again, instead of honoring their agreement to live in peace, the Arabs break their word and launch unprovoked acts of aggression.
*  Once again, Israel withstands years of terror before striking back.
*  Once again, Israel targets terrorist havens, underground tunnels used for smuggling deadly weapons, and military targets.
*  Once again, the craven cowards who run the terrorist organization hide among their women, children, and hospitalized patients, guaranteeing that civilians – whose lives, to them, are meaningless and dispensable – will die.
*  Once again, the terrorists use their useful idiots in the media to capitalize on what Professor Alan Dershowitz has described as their immoral “dead baby strategy.”
*  Once again, the media invoke their “proportionality” mantra – not once about the 10,000 rockets that have targeted Israel, but relentlessly about Israel’s response.
*  Once again, the Islamic bloc and the other thugs that comprise the 47-member United Nations Security Council adopt a resolution that “condemns” Israel and accuses her of “aggression” but omits any mention of – surprise, surprise! – Hamas!
*  Once again, the worldwide media pretend to be “outraged” on behalf of the “victims,” having studiously ignored the real victims in Israel who have been under assault for years.
*  Once again, other “outraged” anti-Semites throughout the world join protest marches to rally against…who? Why Israel, of course, and the United States. But most of all against the Jews!

Make no mistake about it. The outrage, protests, U.N. resolutions and biased media coverage are not about the latest Israeli-Arab conflict. Rather, they are symptoms of the greatest pandemic of hatred the world has ever known – plain, old-fashioned anti-Semitism.

SELECTIVE “VICTIM” WORSHIP

As writer and author Victor Sharpe has noted, the media and the protestors “ignore horrors when Israel can’t be blamed.”

Where, he asks, was their outrage when Arab Islamist governments killed 400,000 people in Darfur and Sudan, and drove two-million from their homes?  When 75,000 Hindus and Buddhists died in the Sri Lanka war?  When nearly four-million people died in the war in the Republic of Congo?  And where was the outrage in the “Second Chechen war with up to 90,000 dead, the Islamic insurgency in the Philippines with 160,000 casualties, an ethnic conflict in Nagaland with the loss of 43,000 lives, the Turkish- Kurdish struggle with 37,000 dead and wounded and…the Islamic insurgency in Kashmir with another 60,000 lives lost?”

“Can you remember seeing street demonstrations or lurid pictures flashed across your TV screen?” Sharpe asks. “The answer is no because they are not Palestinians. As soon as Israel could no longer bear the Palestinian provocations and finally retaliated, the world strangely woke up and ended its deafening silence.”

Sharpe attributes “much of the world’s hypocrisy [and] pro-Palestinian bias” to the fact that “the world hated the stateless Jews and now hates the State of the Jews.”

WHITHER THIS HATRED?

Whether Jew haters learned their animus through mother’s milk, personal mentors, or religious teachings, they all believe that somehow – magically, even – their lives would be better if Jews were not among them – if Jews, in fact, were dead, and Israel wiped off the map.

According to Itamar Marcus and Barbara, Cook of PalestinianMediaWatch.org, “Hamas considers itself an Islamic supremacist movement” and its Charter dictates that Jews be exterminated. The Charter also states: "Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him." Then there is the Hamas poster that says, “Kill a Jew, Go to Heaven.”

But the virulence of the Islamic agenda – toward Jews, Christians, the United States, Israel, and all of Western Civilization – is well-known to media people and others who continue to vilify only the Jews. Some try to hide their bias, but increasing numbers don’t, as evidenced by the savagely anti-Semitic slogans and chants that “protestors” displayed against Israel and on behalf of Hamas in suspiciously well-organized and well-financed demonstrations in Toronto, London, New York City, Los Angeles, Fort Lauderdale, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Germany, the list goes on. 

Of course, our politically correct culture dictates that anti-Semites talk in code:
*  The word “proportionality” is reserved solely for Jews when they are triumphing over their enemies.
*  The rationale about liking Israel but not liking Zionism is code for anti-Jewish feeling
*  The word “realist” that describes the “policies” of U.S. Cabinet appointees, presidential advisors, and foreign-policy “experts” in our State Department is code for preferring Arab oil to Israeli democracy.
*  The accusation that Israelis are racists is, without exception, the rant of anti-Semites who project their own rabid racism onto Jews.

JEW HATRED FOR DUMMIES

Make no mistake about it – we Jews are onto you Jew haters.

We see, with crystal-clear clarity, the media pretend to present “the news” but unable to conceal their anti-Semitism – their racism.

We hear DNA anti-Semites like the liberal racist Bill Moyers – on the taxpayer-funded Public Broadcasting System – say that the “Israeli violence” in Gaza is a consequence of "genetic encoding."

We witness the so-called diplomats at the U.N. extort multimillions of dollars from U.S. taxpayers every year to spread their anti-American, anti-Semitic agenda and to support third-world dictatorships that are, above all things, dedicated to annihilating the Jews.

We watch, with 20-20 vision, the choices of Cabinet members and advisors that our own American presidents have made and we invariably detect the rank odor of systemic Jew hatred.

And we know, as surely as night follows day, that the premier subject that obsesses the entire world is the Jews, Stupid!

Here’s a heads-up to all you Jew haters!  We Jews are here to stay.  The Bible has told us so, and to this date – 5.000 years later – it’s never been wrong!  Get used to it.  We’re not going away, your toxic racism notwithstanding!

Deal with it!


About the author:
Joan Swirsky (http://www.joanswirsky.com/) is a New York- based journalist and author who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com.

Conservative spokesmen failing?

Editorial:  If you’ve ever wondered what America might look like as a one-party country, Republicans are trying to help you out. And by "trying" I mean rolling over and dying. President Elect Obama and his congressional henchmen are in the midst of swiping another $1 trillion-plus from American taxpayers. And Republicans — who once upon a time professed concern for taxpayers — could apparently care less. Either they believe stealing from our grandkids makes for sound policy, or they’re too afraid to second-guess the second coming of Jimmy Carter. Whatever the case, it’s embarrassing.

Today’s Gallup poll finding 53 percent of Americans support Obama’s "stimulus" plan is actually shocking. That his plan only registers support from half the country — without anyone speaking in opposition! — shows not every American has lost his way. Unfortunately those who have all work in Washington.

Today’s pols — and their media co-conspirators — are monopolizing the "debate" over America’s recovery. To sell a Washington economic power-grab, Obama spin-doctor David Axelrod is reportedly teaching Dems to use poll-tested, focus group-approved words — like, "recovery" instead of "recession," "investment" instead of "infrastructure," "bold" and "urgent" instead of "a reckless and impulsive waste."

The sad reality is that marketing-as-politics actually works. Just ask President-elect Barack "Hope ‘n Change" Obama. Or even Republicans of yore. In the 90s, opposition to the estate tax grew to more than 80 percent once Republicans took to slurring it the "death tax."

Now, everyone’s a slave to platitudinous political rhetoric. No pol interested in surviving the next election will oppose an "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan," aka Obama’s trillion-dollar Treasury blowout.

Yet it’s not like we need to dust off our Econ 101 textbooks to find out how well this latest "fix" will work. The U.S. economy has already taken a swan dive into a bottomless abyss of debt. This time last year Congress passed a $200 billion "stimulus" — and just look how well that’s worked out.

Let’s see how popular this "stimulus" bill is once Republicans rebrand it the "Downfall of the American Economy Act." Or the "Trillion Dollar Deficit Protection Act." Or, my favorite, the "Suicide Pact of 2009." Whether the GOP’s still capable of being so bold is another matter. After yesterday’s Obama presser, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell took to the mic and threw down the gauntlet. Yes, he’d support a "stimulus bill" — but only if it costs less than a trillion dollars. Pow! Take that, Democrats!

But at the risk of sounding cynical, its worth noting Congress still has a few voices of sanity. USA Today reports, "As Congress prepares to borrow and spend billions of dollars to revive the economy, a growing group of conservative House Democrats is angling for long-term changes to reduce the federal government’s soaring budget deficit. Leaders of the 51-member Blue Dog coalition … say they want tighter spending controls in exchange for their support of the proposed stimulus."

That’s right — Democrats are now the last best hope for the American taxpayer. Not that the Blue Dogs will ever prevail against their party’s poobahs.

To at least slow down America’s rapidly accelerating deficits, the first step is clear. Republicans need to address its leadership deficit. Fast.


About the author:
After graduating from Dartmouth College, Laura Ingraham worked as a speechwriter in the final two years of the Reagan Administration at the White House, the Department of Transportation and the Department of Education.  She went on to graduate from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was Notes Editor of the Law Review.  She served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Ralph K. Winter on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  After clerking, Laura worked as a white-collar criminal defense attorney for Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.  Laura launched "The Laura Ingraham Show" in 2001.

In addition to hosting her own syndicated radio program, Laura is an author, frequent columnist, and television commentator.  Her book The Hillary Trap, first released in June 2000, was recently re-released in an updated paperback version.  Her second book, Shut Up & Sing: How the Elites in Hollywood, Politics…and the UN are Subverting America is a bestseller.  Ingraham’s most recent book, Power to the People, was released on September 11, 2007, and topped Amazon’s bestseller list on September 14.

In Power to the People, Ingraham focuses on what she calls the "pornification" of America.  She discusses issues such as traditional family values, education, and American patriotism.  Power to the People stresses the importance of getting involved in the culture:  "The main thread that runs through these topics I cover in the book is civic involvement and civic virtue.  Get in the game.  Start a blog, report on what is happening at your local PTA.  If you are a parent, and you are disgusted at what you see on your kid’s computer screen, do something.  Track where your kids go on the Internet.  Tell your kids that you are going to review where they are on the Internet.  Be a parental filter.  Learn about threats that face America – from within and out.  Education is the first line of defense."

Thank You, President Bush

Editorial:  As I type this article, I think of the figurative-millions of both mundane and serious things I’ve done over the past seven-and-a-half years with absolute confidence in America’s safety.  That confidence was inspired by the steadfast leadership and unblinking courage of President George W. Bush, as he faced our country’s most deadly enemies and succeeded in preventing another ghastly attack on American soil after September 11th.

I know, I know.  Let me count the ways that Republicans and conservatives have railed against our 43rd president’s deficit spending, his refusal to pardon the American border-guard heroes Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, his “going socialist” with multiple bailouts, and his departure from any other number of bedrock conservative principles.
And let’s not forget the hysterical leftwing-media and their minions who did everything in their power to undermine the president – during wartime –by writing revisionist-history books and articles, compromising national intelligence (and therefore security), waging bogus lawsuits, and engaging non-stop in their typically childish temper tantrums. 

Yet in spite of all their sound and fury, President Bush kept a steady course, delivering on his promise to keep America safe

“All this time,” writes law professor Thane Rosenbaum in the Wall St. Journal, “Americans have been safe from suicide bombers, biological warfare and collapsing skyscrapers, while the rest of the world has been on red alert.”

Yes, by transforming the intelligence services and other institutions charged with our security and preparing the United States military to meet the challenges of the 21st century, the president allowed all of his critics to be secure in their own homes.

If he had done nothing else, that would have been more than enough for me. Because without safety, a country – just like a family, just like a patient in a hospital – is as good as dead. Today, over 300-million Americans can thank President Bush for keeping them safe while they, themselves, enjoyed seven-and-a-half years  of doing a figurative-million things without worrying about the next terrorist attack on our shores.

How did he do it? In the face of savage pummeling, plunging poll numbers, a treacherous Fifth Column, and worldwide threats from not one but multiple terrorist regimes – all intent on “humbling” big bad America – he let our enemies know that any threat to our safety would be met with a draconian response.

Did he promise to bomb Mecca and Medina, unleash our nuclear weapons on threatening nuclear countries like North Korea, or tell Iran’s madman and his puppet thugs in Hamas and Hezbollah that he would defend a democratic Israel come hell or high water? We’ll never know the answers to the first two questions, but the president has been the best friend that our staunch ally in the Middle East ever had, even while the Arabists in the Pentagon and the State Department tried mightily to undermine his support of Israel.

Thank you, President Bush, for keeping all of us safe!

SPEAK SOFTLY…CARRY A BIG STICK

Just how did President Bush go about striking fear into the hearts of our Islamic-fascist enemies? He never used – as they routinely do – menacing language or outright threats. Not once did he lose his temper or pound his bully pulpit. He tried on multiple occasions to appeal to their “sensitivities” and “humanity,” but clearly these qualities were non-existent.

What did he say that so clearly resonated in the ossified hearts of those who celebrated 9/11 by dancing in the streets and who gleefully held up as gruesome trophies the heads of Americans they had cut off at the neck?

When President Bush said, “bring it on,” our enemies believed him!  They watched:
*  Our Commander-in-Chief topple the murderous tyrant, Saddam Hussein, and free 25-million people to vote – for the first time in their lives – in free elections.
*  America’s heroic fighting forces topple the tyrannical Taliban and allow 25-million people in Afghanistan to vote – for the first time in their lives – in free elections.
*  Their fellow terrorists bomb Bali, Spain, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, London, Madrid, Glasgow Denmark, Istanbul, Algeria, India, the list goes on – but not dare bomb America!
*  The Patriot Act being enacted in 2001 by an overwhelming majority in Congress, and they knew that its conditions – allowing law-enforcement agencies to monitor communications of suspected terrorists within the U.S. – would severely compromise their nefarious plots.
*  Our president defying the “opinions” of the so-called experts and armchair generals who urged him to hoist the white flag of surrender in Iraq, but instead sanctioning the Surge which effectively won the war!
*  The typically anti-American citizens of France, Germany and Italy – having seen non-stop anti-Bush coverage for the better part of a decade – vote for conservative, America-admiring leaders and ardent supporters of President Bush.
*  The powerful liberal media try to destroy the president, while he turned a deaf ear to their incessant blather, and instead focused his laser-like attention on defending our country.
*  And waited as the “lame duck” president exhibited as much energy and determination to defend our country in his waning days in office as he had on September 11, 2001.
*  Our Islamic-fascist enemies within and outside of our country – both jealous of and reviling the American way of life – prove to be the cowards they really are, literally scared to death to mess with our take-no-prisoners president.

Thank you, President Bush, for your belief in the power of freedom, for your undying support of our troops, and for always putting the interests of America light years ahead of fickle polls and feckless critics.  

THE LEFT’S MYTHS VS. HARD REALITY

The president’s enemies on the left have always been fueled by unquenchable envy at his power, which they lust for above all other things – even national security! Spurred on by irrational hate-based emotion – their signature attribute – they entertain the utopian dreams of pre-adolescent children everywhere, who want peace and love and everyone getting along.

Aided and abetted by a leftist media and their bosses – most of them holdovers from the angry “peace and love” 1960s – they rely on a largely uninformed public that prefers glitzy images to historical facts, as well as corrupt organizations like ACORN, which is being investigated in several states and has been indicted in many others for voter fraud.

As the president’s former advisor, Ed Gillespie, has written, the myths the left subscribes to can be exploded by simple – pardon the word – facts!

Did the president’s “go it alone” policy, as the left erroneously insists, ruin America’s standing in the world? Not even close! In fact, the U.S. acted with a multilateral coalition of nations to remove Saddam Hussein from power; had approximately 40 countries supporting us in Afghanistan as well as every NATO ally; was joined by more than 90 nations in sharing terrorist-network information; and succeeded in expanding NATO membership, strengthening ties to China, Japan, South Korea, India, Georgia, Ukraine, Kosovo, Brazil, Mexico and Central America.

“When the President took office, America had trade agreements with only three countries, versus 14 today,” Gillespie says, “with three additional agreements awaiting Congressional approval.”

Did the president’s tax cuts benefit only the wealthy, at the cost of investment in healthcare, education, and the (bogus) issue of global warming? (I added the “bogus”).  The Bush tax cuts, Gillespie adds:
*  Afforded our country its longest run – ever – of uninterrupted job growth, 52 straight months.
*  The creation of 8.3 million jobs.
*  Six consecutive years of economic growth [when] real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by more than 17 percent, a gain of nearly 2.1 trillion dollars.

This is no small feat, given that President Bush inherited a recession from his predecessor and that, according to a study by the International Monetary Fund, “9/11 cost the U.S. economy about $75 billion in lost GDP — not counting property losses of well over $100 billion. The U.S. also incurred future yearly costs of roughly 0.75 percent of GDP to pay for greater security, another big hit.”

Keith Marsden, former adviser at the World Bank and a senior economist in the International Labor Organization, writes further of the president’s extraordinary economic record, saying that in comparison to other advanced economies over the past eight years:
*  U.S. output expanded faster since 2000 than did most advanced economies.
The average per-capita consumption of the U.S. population…was second only to Luxembourg’s.
*  84.7% of the population was covered by health insurance in 2007, an increase of 3.6 million people over 2006.
*  Life expectancy rose to 78 years in 2006.
*  The U.S. employment rate…has remained high by international standards.
*  The unemployment rate averaged 4.7% from 2001-2007, in comparison with a 5.2% average rate during the Clinton years.
*  The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has been largely absorbed in a relatively small increase in the defense budget (to 4.1 percent of GDP in 2006 from 3.8 percent in 1995). A much higher proportion of U.S. income was devoted to the military during World War II and the Korean War.

All this in spite of the fact that the immigrant population of the U.S. grew by nearly 10 million from 1995 to 2005, reaching a total of 38.5 million, according to the World Bank.

Is the president and his administration’s deregulation policy responsible for our current economic crisis? Sorry, but it was the president himself who, way back in 2001, warned in his first budget that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a "potential problem" that "could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting federally insured entities and economic activity." In early 2003, he warned that F&F posed a “systemic risk” and called for a new regulator of these corrupt entities. In the fall of  2003, he called for a new federal agency to monitor F&F, and in 2005, Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve – under Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II (until January 2006) – also issued a stern warning about F&F.

Columnist Wesley Pruden reminds us that, “Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat of New York, and Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat of Massachusetts, did more than any other 10 men to insulate Fannie Mae from nosy regulators and effective federal supervision. Fannie and her senior executives…grew rich on taxpayer largesse while blowing on the kindling of the fire that melted the subprime housing market.”

Pruden left out Democrats Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and legions of others who, like Schumer and Frank, consistently rejected the president’s calls for oversight and accountability. And look what’s happened since they took power in 2006!
*  Consumer confidence has plummeted.
*  Gasoline prices have gone up and then down and are now escalating again.
*  Unemployment has increased dramatically.
*  Home equity has dropped by multi-trillions of dollars, and millions of homes in foreclosure.
*  The Dow has plunged precipitously, with Americans losing trillions in their stocks, bonds, and Mutual Funds investment portfolios.

Thank you, President Bush, for the six years in which you presided over our booming economy and low unemployment rate, and for your continued support of free markets and entrepreneurism.

SO MUCH GRATITUDE, SO LITTLE TIME

*** The No Child Left Behind Act – your brainchild, Mr. President – championed the first-time-ever accountability for both teachers and students by empirically measuring the skills of the former and the test results of the latter. This resulted in fourth-grade students achieving their highest reading and math scores on record, eighth-grade students achieving their highest math scores on record, and also a halving of the achievement gap between black and white students. And let’s not forget that under your watch, Mr. President, federal spending on education increased by nearly 40 percent and Pell Grant funding – to help more than 5.5-million students attend college –nearly doubled.

Your interest and in and concern for young people was also demonstrated, Mr. President, by some cold hard statistics. During your tenure, teenage drug use declined by 25 percent, and the abortion rate was at its lowest since 1974.
***Presciently, Mr. President, you proposed a plan to “fix” the Social Security system, which you knew was due to go bankrupt by 2017, just eight years from now. The opposition, predictably, didn’t like your plan. But you knew, as radio co-hosts Perry Atkinson and Bob Just have described, that “the Ponzi scheme known as Social Security [is simply] a government “slush fund.”
Again addressing the concerns of our aging population, Mr. President, you initiated the market-based Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit program, affording over 40-million Americans better access to prescription drugs and a savings (over the next five years) of approximately $240 billion. That is not to omit that your children’s S-CHIP health insurance program resulted in a decrease of 800,000 uninsured children from 2001 to 2007.

***The Patriot Act – under your watch, Mr. President – finally allowed the FBI and CIA to share information and wiretap terrorists’ phone calls, both forbidden by the politically-correct sages of the former administration. Thanks to this Act – and with the help of our military – nearly 5,000 terrorist plots have been thwarted (many which targeted our country) and untold numbers of America’s enemies have been arrested, imprisoned, or deported, and worldwide terror attacks have decreased by 40 percent since 2001.

***Compassionately, Mr. President, you addressed the problem of homelessness more aggressively than did any of your predecessors by initiating the “Housing First” program. As a result, there has been a 30-percent decline in chronically homeless people; their numbers declining from 176,000 to 12,400 people, according to one quite-persuasive census.

***Again, compassionately, Mr. President, you were solely responsible for initiating the most magnanimous  HIV/AIDS (and malaria and tuberculosis) treatment program in history for the African continent. In 2003, only 50,000 Africans were taking antiretroviral drugs, but today that number has reached 1.3 million! As PajamasMedia.com reports, ”The President created the $30-billion Emergency Plan for Aids Relief, and extended it this year with $48 billion to train 140,000 healthcare workers who specialize in HIV prevention and treatment. The rock star and activist Bob Geldorf openly acknowledged that the president `has done more than any other president’ for Africa.” Not incidentally, trade with Africa has doubled during President Bush’s tenure.

But your keen interest in human health didn’t stop in Africa, Mr. President. In our country, you increased the budget for the National Institutes of Health by 38 percent – from $17.1 billion to $23.7 billion, and you increased funding for t\he National Science Foundation budget from $4.4 billion in 2001 to $6.0 billion in 2008.

***To protect the sanctity of the United States Constitution, Mr. President, you appointed the esteemed jurists John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, both of them intellectual scholars who will continue – I trust – to uphold their oaths to “defend and protect”  this most cherished document of our Founding Fathers.

***Protecting our environment did not escape your attention, Mr. President. During your terms in office, air pollution decreased dramatically, both wind and solar energy production nearly doubled, and nearly $18 billion was devoted to the research and development of alternative energy technologies. And all credit, Mr. President, for protecting more than 27-million acres of Federal forest and grasslands and wetlands.

Thank you, President Bush, for your prescience, compassion and wisdom in addressing the most urgent issues in America and around the world.

CHARACTER, DECENCY, MORAL CLARITY, CLASS

Jim Towey, president of Saint Vincent College in PA and the president’s director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives from 2002-2006, writes that in spite of the calumny the president has endured, he “kept his head up and  soldiered on. He took the criticism in stride… reading a daily devotional …signing letters to the families of the fallen”…”

Towey continues: “Mother Teresa was asked at the end of her life whether she was discouraged because after decades of caring for the dying and destitute in Calcutta little seemed to have changed. She replied, `No. God doesn’t call me to be successful. God calls me to be faithful.’ George W. Bush was faithful. He had a charge to keep and he kept it.”

It is now known, as Towey mentions, that for many years, President Bush and First Lady Laura Bush privately visited thousands of injured veterans, and met, again privately, with many hundreds of families whose relatives had been lost in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Why did this information emerge only in the waning days of the Bush presidency? Because like all of the facts cited above of the president’s extraordinary accomplishments, the virulent leftwing media – the public’s main source of information – purposefully withheld this information because members of the Fourth Estate take their goose-stepping marching orders from the leftist honchos who still believe – empirical evidence to the contrary – that big bad America is the root cause of the world’s problems. Good news about America is anathema to them, and anyone with President Bush’s unabashed love for our country and moral clarity is especially loathsome.

Writer Arnold Ahlert says that, “Unfortunately, recognizing the difference between good and evil has become Western culture’s greatest liability. Nowadays it has become necessary to bring the `reasoning’ of moral relativity, multiculturalism, and non-judgmentalism to every equation. The result? Moral paralysis Virtually every American politician in both parties talked about the necessity of removing Saddam Hussein. George W. Bush did it! Why? Because he dared to defy the moral paralysis that deems talking about wrongness – as opposed to acting against it – is sufficient.”

When the president addressed the Israeli Parliament (the Knesset) in June on the occasion of Israel’s 60th anniversary, he recalled how 11 minutes after Israel was declared a state, America – on the order of President Harry Truman – was the first nation to recognize Israel’s independence.

“What Bush didn’t say,” writes political science professor and author Paul Kengor, “was that not only was America alone then, but so was its president – who recognized Israel in defiance of his staff, from Secretary of State George Marshall to Secretary of Defense James Forrestal…”

Of course, the American public never learned about this speech because the media cannot tolerate the similarities between Truman and Bush, or the distinct possibility that their bête noire will achieve the same exalted status and sterling legacy as the man from Independence has.

“History will say that we misunderestimated George W. Bush,” writes Andrew Roberts. “I am writing, of course, about Harry S Truman, generally regarded today as one of the greatest of all the 43 presidents, and the man who set the United States on the course that ended decades later in the defeat of Communism. If the West wins the modern counterpart of that struggle, the War Against Terror, historians will look back in amazement at the present unpopularity of George W Bush, and marvel at it quite as much as we now marvel at the 67 per cent disapproval rates for Truman throughout 1952.”

Commenting on the president’s “internal fortitude” and “equanimity,” columnist Charles Krauthammer writes: “Bush is much like Truman, who developed the sinews of war for a new era (the Department of Defense, the CIA, the NSA), expanded the powers of the presidency, established a new doctrine for active intervention abroad, and ultimately engaged in a war (Korea) — also absent an attack on the U.S. — that proved highly unpopular. So unpopular that Truman left office disparaged and highly out of favor. History has revised that verdict. I have little doubt that Bush will be the subject of a similar reconsideration.”

Throughout the Bush presidency, Americans have seen a man with unfailing modesty, character, decency, moral clarity and class. He was as consistently gracious to his critics as they were consistently rude and rabid. He never wavered in distinguishing good from evil and freedom from tyranny, or, as he explained in his second inaugural, “the moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right.”

On January 1, 2009, President Bush, speaking from his ranch in Texas, said: “As my time in office comes to a close, I thank the American people for trusting me with the honor of serving our great country. It has been a tremendous privilege…”

Thank you, President Bush!


About the author:
Joan Swirsky (www.joanswirsky.com) is a New York-based author and journalist who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com.