Back in the day, at
The Oklahoman, a certain prominent Democratic politician took his
children each day to the same Catholic school the McGuigan children
attended. Once, a fellow commentator wanted to accuse that leader of
hypocrisy for putting his children in a private school. I defended him,
telling colleagues, “He is not a hypocrite. He is a father.”
And yet, it’s hard to disagree with the straight-forward argument that
the poor deserve the same level of choice as the well-to-do. There are
available many models, public and private, of effective urban
education.
The powerful and emotional motion picture documentary, “Waiting for
Superman,” is full of inconvenient truths. The documentary was developed
by none-other-than Davis Guggenheim, who made the Oscar-winning film,
“An Inconvenient Truth,” with former Vice President Al Gore.
This time, Guggenheim’s message is not the formulaic of global warming,
but the fundamental flaws that afflict modern American public education.
The film demonstrates that many (and in some cities, most) urban public
schools are “dropout factories” from which few students escape with
dreams alive and/or with adequate skills for the modern workforce, let
alone for contemporary higher education.
As Guggenheim admits with blunt integrity early in this story he tells
so brilliantly, he decided to produce “Superman” after reaching the
conclusion that the only good Los Angeles school for his children near
where he lived was private.
If Guggenheim is the unseen narrative adult hero of this “Superman,” the
on-screen center of gravity is Geoffrey Canada, the revolutionary (and
often self-deprecating) educator who has developed a cluster of
effective charter schools in Harlem. Yes, Canada’s face “looks” like
Harlem.
It is Canada whose poignant childhood memories of Superman provide the
basis for the title, and for Guggenheim’s deft use of a cultural
touchstone, in the form of a brief segment lifted from the original
television series about the classic superhero.
The film’s adult heroine is Michelle Rhee, a brave Asian-American who
labored mightily, in the face of vitriol and spite, to reform public
education in Washington, D.C.
The villains? Well, the national president of the American Federation of
Teachers (AFT) makes a pretty good one in this film. With bracing and
bold humor, Guggenheim illustrates and documents the annual “dance of
the lemons” in which public school administrators pass from one school
to the next the worst teachers who, due to union rules, cannot be fired.
What makes this all so sad is an inconvenient truth not quite explicitly
made clear in the film: The National Education Association is a much
greater impediment to quality and needed transformation than the AFT.
The victims in the story? Without a doubt, they are the children and
parents whose heartache and near-despair propels the narration, who move
mountains and beseech Heaven for an affordable and rational school in
which to build a better future. These victims become, before our eyes,
heroes through simple and magnificent perseverance.
It’s not said or written as often as in days of yore, but in this case
the old mantra fits: If you don’t see any other film this year, make it
“Waiting for Superman.” It may be the most important American film thus
far produced in the Twenty-First Century. It holds forth the
possibility that American education can be refashioned based on models
that work, and through teachers who teach.
The National Chamber Foundation,
an arm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is on a 12-city tour of the
United States. The group is sponsoring a showing of “Waiting for
Superman” this Thursday (November 18) at 2:30 p.m. at the film’s
Oklahoma City “home,” the AMC Quail Springs (2501 W. Memorial Road).
A panel discussion after the showing will feature the incoming state
Superintendent of Public Instruction, Janet Barresi, a founder of two
charter schools in Oklahoma City. Also on the panel will be Tracy
McDaniel of KIPP Academy, Bill Price of the Oklahoma School Choice
Coalition, Ed Allen of the city chapter of the American Federation of
Teachers (AFL-CIO), David Blatt of the Oklahoma Policy Institute, and Phyllis Hudecki of the Oklahoma Business and Education Coalition.
The panel will be moderated by the State Chamber’s Fred Morgan.
Co-sponsors of the showing include the Business and Education Coalition,
the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs and Blatt’s group, OK Policy.
Rep. Jabar Shumate of Tulsa observed at a forum last month, sponsored by
Inasmuch Foundation and the Foundation for Oklahoma City Public
Schools, that one of the heroine’s of the “Superman” film, Michelle
Rhee, no longer is working as superintendent of schools in Washington,
D.C.
Shumate, a black Democrat who has emerged as a fearless advocate
of the kind of reforms advanced in the “Superman” film, says real
reforms in Oklahoma will require “an all hands on deck approach.”
Ed Allen said at that panel last month “the union took hits in this
film, and deservedly so.” He pledged his local would “be part of the
solution, not the problem.” He said, “We will do what it takes.” Allen
was involved in historic negotiations at U.S. Grant High School that led
to the departure of roughly half the failing school’s teacher pool.
Another speaker at that Inasmuch forum was Carol Kelley, the principal
at Harding Charter High School, one of the institutions Barresi guided.
After that panel, Shumate reflected: “There is no Superman. He’s not
coming to save the day. But the people in this room are Supermen. They
have to do what’s right.”
“The Lottery” documentary, shown at the Oklahoma Museum of Art last
month, shows the true stories of several minority children and their
families who, desperate for better education, work and study hard at
highly-challenged regular public schools or, in one case, a private
school. They pin all their hopes on admission to the Harlem Success
Academy.
In “The Lottery,” only one child initially makes it to a good school,
although a second youngster gets a later shot at a better experience.
At the art museum, Price stressed the need to get rid of tenure and
“trial de novo” for dismissed teachers, a reform the local union says is
under consideration. Dr. Barresi recounted Harding Charter’s “no
excuses” themes.
You get the idea: “Waiting for Superman” is no game of chance. Along
with a handful of other powerful cultural currents, it carries ideas
whose time has come.
At least in Oklahoma City and Tulsa, the atmosphere for broader choice
is here, with advocacy of new charters and more elements of full-scale
access to quality, including private schools. If such reform is not
forthcoming, it would be no surprise if charter schools start to look
like a comparatively moderate approach to public school problems.
Writing this week for The Wall Street Journal online, David Feith
predicts charter schools, merit pay and other issues of the day are just
the beginning. He contends a new fault line is the “parent trigger.”
As he reports, “The average student in Los Angeles has only a 50% chance
of graduating high school and a 10% chance of attending college.” A
liberal group called “Parent Revolution” asserts that’s a crisis. They
want, in the words of activist Ben Austin, "an unabashed and
unapologetic transfer of raw power from the defenders of the status
quo"— education officials and teachers unions — "to the parents."
Remember, that comes from a self-identified liberal.
The parent trigger passed into law in sunny California in January, and
will allow parents to form new charter schools if 51% of the parents in a
failing public school petition for forcible transformation.
Unions, led by the California Federation of Teachers, call this a “lynch
mob provision.” A similar not-quite-as-radical law has passed in
Connecticut, and legislators in five states — Georgia, Indiana,
Michigan, New Jersey and West Virginia — told Feith they planned to
unveil similar measures soon.
Feith reflects, “The growing popularity of parent trigger challenges the
common assertion that schools fail primarily because they serve
apathetic families. Like charter-school lotteries bursting with
thousands of parents and students, trigger drives demonstrate that
legions of parents actively reject their children’s failing schools. The
national spread of parent trigger will also demonstrate how the
campaign for choice in education — once a predominantly conservative and
Republican interest — has gone bipartisan.”
One national activist for the parent trigger put it this way: "We can wait for Superman, or recognize that Superman is us."
In 1994, after a rough couple of years as president, some people wanted
to write Bill Clinton’s political obituary when Republicans seized
control of the U.S. House for the first time in nearly a half-century.
Then, Clinton reinvented himself, embracing ideas he had once eschewed,
including welfare reform.
The rest is history. Not only was Clinton re-elected, he went on,
despite his personal problems, to highlight welfare reform as one of his
presidency’s most notable achievements.
Clinton’s advocacy of welfare reform might have been cynical, but there
does not seem to be cynicism in Obama’s embrace of a few strong
education reform ideas. He wants to increase the number of charter
schools, for starters.
Recently, he has spent time with the children and parents portrayed so
powerfully and compassionately in “Waiting for Superman.” Maybe the
president was planning for the future. Maybe he was just being nice.
Time will tell.
Obama will be looking for ways to assure his own relevancy in a national
political environment in which his harshest critics prevailed, at least
for now. If he’s serious about that bipartisanship he touted in 2008,
but which seemed to drop into the memory hole in a race to the Left in
2009-10, it’s hard to imagine a better place to start than with school
choice.
This is the one substantive policy area where he and most Republicans
pretty much agree, yet where he has a respectable Democratic base
scattered around America.
Make no mistake: The future will bring broader choice and an insistence
on proven strategies in public schools. Reform will not again be denied.
Obama can jump to the head of the parade, or stay on the sidelines.
It’s up to him. School choice could save the Obama presidency. Call it another inconvenient truth.
About the Author:
Patrick B. McGuigan is the editor of
CapitolBeatOK, an online news service, and senior editor at The City
Sentinel, a weekly newspaper in Oklahoma City. He is a certified school
teacher, and taught two years at Justice Alma Wilson Seeworth Academy, a
public charter alternative school based in east Oklahoma City. He is
the author of several hundred news articles and commentaries on American
education and a regular contributor as Capital Editor to TulsaToday, the Internet’s oldest online independent news service.
stops by. 
If you’ve been downtown recently you have seen the transformation taking place in front of the amazing BOK Center. It’s getting close to the start of the holiday season and it’s time for Winterfest 2010 presented by Arvest Bank and the Lobeck Taylor Family Foundation.
Growing up in suburban Broken Arrow, I never really had the chance to grow an interest in weapons. To my Dad, who had three guns above the bed most of my teenage years, I never showed enough interest to warrant all the fees and licenses. Also, I was a bit of a pseudo hippie-stoner more interested in skateboarding, science or other creative and intellectual pursuits; than the rough and tumble “manly-man” things of the world. Your basic teenage lump, I never shot a gun until well into my twenties. 
The plan was to buy something for less than $500.00 functional in home defense, hunting, and that could be used by my spouse. In my mind, that added up to one thing, a shotgun. Last Saturday November 13, we journeyed to the QT Event Center at Expo Square in Tulsa to attend 
The vendors weren’t the only ones selling; many people were walking around with signs in the ends of barrels or over their chest listing the weapons they literally carried to sell.
The people there were the most polite I have ever witnessed in such a large venue with so little walking room. I remember hearing “I’m sorry” or “Excuse me” for just the slightest brush while passing more times than I could count. Mrs. Manners would have been proud. The rest areas were clean, and litter was almost non-existent. Men differed to let women pass, and women for the most part were dressed modestly. In fact, the Tulsa State Fair last month was much more dirty, crowded, and uncouth.