Yearly Archives: 2008

Whose property is it anyway?

Editorial:  When I was knocking doors during the campaign, I met a man who told me he was greatly concerned with his home being a target for ever-increasing property taxes.  He said that he and his wife were fortunate enough to pay off their home mortgage about two years ago.  He said he always knew the amount of his property taxes, but didn’t think about it much because they were a part of his mortgage payment.  However, now that he doesn’t have a monthly mortgage payment, he now has to put over $400 per month in savings so that he can pay his property taxes at the end of the year!  They live in south Tulsa, the highest taxed property in our state.  He said he and his wife are not old enough to qualify for the senior citizen protection of freezing their property taxes, but are greatly concerned with the potential of increased burden of higher and higher property taxes!
I spoke with another couple who said when they purchased their home about 9 years ago, their property taxes were approximately $6,000 per year.  Now, their property taxes are over $9,000, a 50% increase!!!

Currently it takes a supermajority for an increase on a school bond; however there is a strong effort underway to reduce that to a simple majority.  One school superintendent is quoted in the Tulsa World; "For 15 years, I’ve lobbied the (state) Legislature regarding the supermajority for the fact that I believe it is very undemocratic,”  and the school board president at the time is quoted; "I think it should be just a simple majority."

Former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Todd Hiett, told me there have been several attempts to reduce the supermajority, and the last time it was defeated by only one vote.  He reminded me that originally, only property owners were allowed to vote in elections that would increase property taxes.  That measure was determined to be unconstitutional and was replaced with the supermajority rule to help protect property owners. 

There seems to be no satisfying the appetite of government for our money.  As citizens, we are expected to submit to the whims of elected officials whenever they say they need more money.  But where is the accountability???  Don’t label me “anti-education” just because I oppose property tax increases.  Show me you have spent your current dollars prudently and that there is a genuine need for new money before you expect me to just fall in line.

I am currently working with Oklahoma Legislators to find a member who will author a bill to protect our homes and property.  Not only do I want to keep the supermajority before we ever see an increase in property taxes, I say we must require a minimum turnout of 25% of the registered voters, within the district being taxed, for the vote to be validated.  A school board cannot take any official actions without a quorum present.  A city council cannot take any official action without a quorum being present.  Our Oklahoma State Legislature cannot take any official action without a quorum being present.  The Oklahoma State Legislature even requires a supermajority of their votes before they can pass a tax increase. 

I realize we cannot make people vote.  However, there is a strong practice of finding election dates that will likely produce a low voter turnout and then working hard to only get out those supporting the measure.  This change will require those wanting the measure to truly inform the voters and educate them of the genuine need. 

I am glad that we, as a state, have put in measures to protect senior citizens from ever-increasing property taxes. 
 
I think it is now time to put in place measures to protect all of our homes and property from being the targets of hungry bureaucrats and elected officials.  After all it is our home and our property. 

Please contact your State Senator and State Representative and ask them to protect your property and support these requirements. 


About the author:

Jeff Applekamp is an Oklahoma state licensed mortgage loan officer and a registered lobbyist, but most importantly, he is a conservative.  A former candidate for the State Senate, Jeff Applekamp is committed to continue fighting for true conservative values to protect all Oklahomans.

Iconic success

The Eagles Band opened Tulsa’s new BOK Center Saturday September 6 as rock star stallions should – technically excellent, personally engaging, and noticeably irreverent.  One of the best bands in history rocked the new house as cheers from the crowd shook the rafters.

“Hello Tulsa, it’s been a long time since we were in Oklahoma,” they said.  Truth be told, Tulsa never would have had a chance to book this quality of show without the new arena.

One vender from Dallas said, “There are 14,000 people in the house tonight and it takes that size of an audience to book the Eagles.”  He also complemented the facility’s functionality and design.  “This is a hall for fame.”

 

Guests from Oklahoma City had seen the Eagles perform five times over the years and said the Tulsa venue acoustics were the best.  Complements surged for the facility design and management.  The management company, SMG, brought in experienced leadership from other regional facilities to assist opening night.

Yes, there were some functionality issues, but none the public noticed.

Funny, but Tulsa may become known as the home of the “Boc Center” which natives pronounce using the acronym B.O.K.  Visitors or those just driving past could carry the different pronunciation as the Eagles noted from the stage.  Oh well, the bank paid for the naming rights and so speaks their logo.

As the closest media office to the new arena, Tulsa Today hosted friends and strangers in the neighborhood.  From our roof-top perspective, we could see two of the three parking buildings never filled the top three floors available.  

Pleasant surprise, Tulsans are not addicted to strip-malls with parking just outside the door.  They will walk a few blocks in downtown Tulsa just as is done in Chicago, Houston, New Orleans, etc.  

The Eagles are very particular in controlling media coverage.  There were different rules for video and still photography and media groups moved in and out of the venue under escort.  Still photographers were only allowed to shoot from the area of the sound booth during the first three songs then were escorted out of the building.  Thank goodness we didn’t have to hold hands.

Insiders report the Eagles performance contract required the venue to shut down all air-conditioning 24 hours in advance.  It’s part of the act and better for the band’s vocal cords to begin in a slightly warm room.  From the stage the band said, “Well, we finally got them to turn the air-conditioning on” as the crowd began to feel the breeze.

Delusional critics of the venue (the same fools that opposed Vision 2025 and said the arena would never be built) must feel exceptionally stupid.  We could list them by name, but it would be a short list of antagonistic ambition whores that have befouled local debate for far too long – blog as they will, Tulsans that attended the Eagles concert continue to rave on the music, facility, presentation, and the crowd days after the experience.

At Third and Cheyenne, Jared Jordan, General Manager of SoChey Jazz Café kept the kitchen open past 1:00 am as the crowd migrated around the neighborhood. 

"Business was great," he said.

It was past 2:00 am when Tulsa Today locked the office and turned out the lights.  We didn’t know how many friends we had until the BOK Center started booking stars, but we are glad to host in Tulsa’s growing downtown entertainment neighborhood.

World famous architect Cesar Pelli noted that it was unusual for a contract to specify “iconic design” as was the case for Tulsa’s arena, but in the opinion of the crowd attending the Eagles concert – Pelli accomplished the task and met that incredibly high standard.  The BOK Center is and will be a whole lot of fun in Tulsa for a long time thanks to the 60 percent of citizens who voted in support and the private donations that added art and other flourishes. 


The “Anti-March of the Penguins” documentary

Encounters at the End of the World
United States, 2007

Directed By: Werner Herzog
Written By: Werner Herzog
Starring: Werner Herzog
Running Time: 99 minutes
Rated G
3.5 out of 5 stars

Werner Herzog doesn’t make “normal” movies, and while that is a gross generalization, it’s also completely true in his case. The German auteur’s filmmography reads like an issue of Bizarre magazine (yes, it exists): violently manic actors, set pieces that almost killed large swaths of crew members, short films where he boils and eats his own footwear, and Bruno S., a mentally unbalanced street musician that Herzog discovered and cast as the lead in two of his films. In The Grand, Herzog starred as “The German,” a poker player who needed to kill at least one fuzzy animal per day. You have to wonder if his performance was based on personal experience.

With all of that in mind, you know that Encounters at the End of the World, Herzog’s latest documentary about the Great White Continent and the odd souls who populate it, is not going to be about cuddly penguins bobbing around in the snow. Herzog says as much himself in the opening narration; when the National Science Foundation offered to send him to Antarctica, he made it clear he wasn’t interested in the breeding patterns of flightless birds. Instead, he wanted to answer questions like, “Why couldn’t a monkey ride a goat into the sunset?” His query is punctuated by, what else, a painting of a monkey in a cowboy hat riding a goat into the sunset. Seriously.

Herzog has always been obsessed with obsession, both his own and others. His films are meditations on ridiculous dreams that only make sense to the dreamer, but inevitably art begets life and Herzog and his films end up becoming as manic as their subjects. In Fitzcarraldo, a man dreams of hauling a steamboat over a mountain so he can monopolize an unreachable section of the Amazon river. During filming, Herzog actually hauled a 320 ton steamship over a mountain without the aid of special effects. It’s difficult to tell if Fitzcarraldo is a surrogate for Herzog’s obsession or if it’s the other way around. Encounters likewise blurs the line between documentarian and documented; it’s as much about the introverted penguin expert as it is about the man who is asking him if homosexual penguins exist.

Herzog, along with a lone cameraman, spent 7 weeks at McMurdo, a 1000 person strong outpost that looks like “an ugly mining town” and features “abominations such as an aerobics studio and yoga classes.” He provides off-the-cuff interviews with welders, linguists, horticulturalists, meteorologists, divers, and volcanologists, each subject being probed with not-so-subtle questions designed to ascertain why they’ve chosen the end of nowhere as their home. Interspersed are expansive shots of the arctic plains and ephemeral moments under the ice with sci-fi-like sea creatures, juxtaposed sonically with Aussie didjeridos and haunting choral arrangements. But the landscapes, as beautiful as they are, are not the focus of Herzog’s obsession (any 5 minutes of Planet Earth will outshine the entirety of Encounters in that regard); he always returns to the lonely denizens who’ve eschewed civilization for hostile wilderness.

Throughout the film, Herzog continues to revisit Ernest Shackleton and his ill-fated Endurance expedition of 1914. The explorer and his crew nearly perished to the man in a bid to carry the British flag across the entire continent by way of the South Pole, and you can practically hear the admiration and jealousy in Herzog’s voice when he talks about it (as a side note, see The Endurance: Shackleton’s Legendary Antarctic Expedition, a thrillingly hard-to-believe documentary on the subject). The German director obviously desired an experience more akin to Shackleton’s, and is audibly disappointed when he receives the equivalent of an extended stay at a muddy ski resort.

One last image remains in my mind’s eye. After asking the penguin expert whether or not penguins can go insane, Herzog’s camera catches a lone bird abandoning his companions and striking out towards the mountains some 700 miles away. The black and white blob waddles and slides towards what will be certain death, apparently possessed by an irresistible compulsion. It doesn’t matter that the endeavor is stupid or insane or suicidal or all three; the penguin must make it to those mountains.

Herzog can obviously sympathize.

Encounters at the End of the World is currently playing at the Circle Cinema. Call 592-FILM for showtimes and tickets.


About the author:
Evan Derrick loves movies, loves talking about movies, and even makes them from time to time. In addition to being the founder and senior editor for MovieZeal.com, he is also a member of the Oklahoma Film Critics Circle and a father of two beautiful children. He can be reached for comment or complaint at
" />
evan@moviezeal.com.

 

Energy fight is the people’s war

Analysis: The Bush Administration made some mistakes in the War on Terror.  It was not just the name (perhaps “War to Prevent Mass Murder of Civilians” is too long, but terror is simply a tactic) that placed America at a disadvantage; it was the analysis. To avoid being terrorized, they pleaded for Americans to ignore the war and just go about their daily business.

Americans are far too participatory to take kindly to being patted on the head and told that others will tend to the business of the day.  We are willing to sacrifice to defend this land and people.  As the roar from the crowd suggested during John McCain’s nomination acceptance speech – We demand to participate in the fight.

To win the battle for peace, we can refuse products that fund instability.  Americans are willing to begin an Energy War not against any other nation or people, but FOR our nation and our people

We must do it–drill every domestic oil and gas field, expedite nuclear energy expansion, embellish tax incentives for alternative solar and wind development with installations large and small, forget ethanol (corn is best for food) in favor of other non-edible bio-material, and in other ways–change the paradigm powering peaceful progress.

As the Imperial Japanese military discovered in World War II, when the sleeping giant who greatly desires peace is awakened by war – America will win.

Unfortunately, the historic American tradition of ending politics at the water’s edge has been set aside by the most embittered, disingenuous, and corrupt Congress in American history.  Using lies and personal attacks; extreme Liberals funded by the convicted criminal George Soros (Insider Trading: France 2002) demonize real solutions. 

Congress is now the most hateful and hated institution in America and public opinion polls show that Congress’ popularity is less than half of that of President Bush. It is meaningful to remember that fully half of President Bush’s negative poll numbers are Conservatives in revolt over his failure to confront the corrupt blunder-mouths in Congress.  (See Nancy Pelosie and Harry Ried for more detail.)

Voters may well expel more members of Congress than pundits expect because many have seen as Stuart Jolly of Americans for Prosperity, Oklahoma recently wrote in an Oklahoman editorial that our leaders in Washington have continued to debate increased drilling but haven’t passed any legislation to increase supply and lower prices."

He demands that, “America needs less rhetoric and more action.”

While Jolly does not believe we will ever be completely energy independent, (others are more hopeful) he writes:

“Surveys show that the vast majority of all Americans support increased development of resources in areas like the Outer Continental Shelf. We are tired of having Congress enforce high gas prices by restricting access to areas with known reserves … America is the only country that discourages development of its own domestic energy resources, artificially and unnecessarily inflating reliance on supplies from abroad. No other country does this because no other country could survive doing this, and we can’t either. Americans will continue to pay higher and higher energy costs until our citizens and Congress understand that common sense and logic must prevail over die-hard environmentalists on this issue.

Fortunately, we now have the technology to explore and develop our natural resources in ways that are environmentally safe and efficient. The use of advanced methods to drill and extract oil and natural gas means we can now cultivate our resources in a responsible fashion, and without any of the nightmarish scenarios that proponents would have you believe. In this way, Congress can stop harvesting resources from consumer pocketbooks and start harvesting resources from our oceans and elsewhere. The mere fact that the United States finally has gotten serious about combating our reliance on mported energy supplies will speak volumes to the world,” Jolly said.  

Nancy Farrier agrees and in a August 26 letter to the editor wrote:

“It is unfair that families and businesses in Oklahoma are being harmed by high energy costs while Congress bickers but has not passed meaningful legislation to give us relief. Every survey shows the vast majority of Americans want more drilling and fewer limits on domestic resources. We could easily increase the supply of oil and gas produced here at home. We could easily be less reliant on foreign imports.

American consumers are suffering.  Alternative and renewable energy will unquestionably play a huge role in the future, but we need quick action to reduce prices now. Opening of new resources can spark an immediate downward trend in prices with its impact on the markets and its eventual impact on global supply. America has the technology to drill efficiently and responsibly in an environmentally safe way. It is time to move past the rhetoric and develop our own energy sources,” she added.

It’s an “oil patch thing.” Oklahomans have been there and done it worldwide.

If Congress would get out of the way, our free people can and will win America’s War for Energy.  Maybe it is significant that this rally call is issued from Tulsa, Oklahoma formerly known as the “Oil Capital of the World.”  

Tulsans have seen the good and bad of the industry and our history is closely intertwined.  As the “capital” designation long ago migrated, Tulsa is a smaller dog in the fight, but we stand as witness that individual businessmen with private capital, creativity, and the will to win can build an environmentally sound energy bridge to the alternative energy future – if only Congress will get out of the way.  

We can get oil and gas flowing from almost anywhere in less than two years.


About the author: David Arnett began his career in professional journalism in 1985 and has published Tulsa Today since 1996 – before Al Gore invented the Internet.  He has won two national awards as a First Amendment Publisher.  Arnett is a Constitutional Republican, Public Information Specialist and Conservative Media Critic. This analysis may be reproduced without charge with proper attribution and links back to the original source.  Arnett is available for interview by recognized media.

Immigration law scholar to speak on enforcement

Tuesday, 09 September 2008
Professor Michael A. Olivas, a nationally recognized expert in the field of immigration law, will address the volatile immigration issues that state and local governments are currently debating (such as Oklahoma’s H.B. 1804) in a lecture at the University of Tulsa College of Law.

The lecture, “Immigration – Related State and Local Ordinances: Pigtail Ordinances and the Proper Role for Enforcement,” is free and open to the public. It will be held at 7:30 p.m., Thursday, Sept. 11, in the Price & Turpen Courtroom at the TU College of Law.

Olivas is widely recognized as one of the nation’s leading scholars of immigration law, having served twice as chair of the American Association of Law Schools Immigration Law Section. He has also authored several books dealing with immigration and related issues.

Olivas, the William B. Bates Distinguished Chair of Law and director of the Institute of Higher Education Law and Governance at the University of Houston Law Center, is the only person to hold membership in both the American Law Institute and the National Academy of Education.

Along with his expertise in immigration law, Olivas has a long-standing expertise in higher education law. He has served two terms as general counsel for the American Association of University Professors and three terms as chair of the Law and Education section of the AALS.

ABOUT THE TU COLLEGE OF LAW:
The TU College of Law provides an academically rigorous, yet congenial atmosphere with opportunities for scholarship, leadership and faculty mentoring. Students develop practical skills through participation with student-driven legal journals, award-winning moot court teams, two on-campus clinics and a new pro bono program.

Joint interdisciplinary degrees include a JD/MBA and JD/MTAX and unique specialties include energy and environmental law and Native American law. The Mabee Legal Information Center is recognized as one of the nation’s top university law libraries. The Boesche Legal Clinic gives students the opportunity to gain practical experience with programs in transactional law and immigration law. The TU College of Law is one of the four colleges of The University of Tulsa, which is ranked among U.S. News and World Report’s Top 100 Universities. To find out more, visit www.law.utulsa.edu.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 09 September 2008 )