Author Archives: Admin

A leader, a dreamer and a doer – Archie Hoffman sought return of Cheyenne & Arapaho lands

Archie Doyle Hoffman, Sr., was born to Fred and Kathryn Hoffman in Clinton, Oklahoma, on February 2, 1937. An honored tribal elder in his latter years, he died July 25, 2012.

As a boy, Archie was raised in Herring, Oklahoma, later attending high school in both Hammon and Cheyenne. He was a good student, adept at solving practical problems.

Archie joined the U.S. Air Force in 1956, serving an overseas tour in Spain before his honorable discharge. He married Jesse Mae Hamilton on October 12, 1957. Over many years, he was a representative for the Native American Church.

To earn a living, he applied practical skills he had learned as a mechanic in the military. He made his way in the broader culture while retaining love for the old ways, including devotion to the rights of the Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes. He worked for the tribes for around 15 years during the 1970s and 1980s, then returned as an elected officer in the 1990s.

Mr. Hoffman was preceded in death by his mother, father, brother, sister, wife, son, daughter and grandson. He was survived by four sisters and two brothers, three of his daughters, 13 grandchildren and 15 great-grandchildren.

As the narrator of a news report for NBC television put it in the 1990s, “The Cheyenne & Arapaho tribes lost some of their lands to the federal government back in the late 1800s. And since then they’ve been fighting a 100-year battle to get them back. They tried lobbying, they tried the courts, and then, in 1996, after a meeting with some local Democratic officials, they tried something as old as American politics itself — they wrote a check.”

Thus began a story on behind-the-scenes efforts by Hoffman and a few other Indian leaders to regain land around historic Fort Reno that the U.S. government had long promised would – if the facility ever stopped being a military installation – be returned to the tribes. With the encouragement of a Democratic fundraiser, Hoffman concluded, as he told reporters, "You don’t get something for nothing. Not in this world."

Hoffman said at the time he had noticed the increasing clout of the Cherokee tribe and its leaders – influence garnered in part from significant campaign contributions to both major political parties. He and other leaders of Oklahoma’s smaller Indian Nations were frustrated by the ability of the larger tribes to leverage sovereign rights, leavened with those significant political gifts, to gain local and national market advantages.

Hoffman hoped adding political money to the merits of the Two Tribes’ case would open doors. A promised 1996 contribution of $100,000 to the national Democrats’ drive for Bill Clinton’s reelection was supposed to grease the skids to get a serious look at the issue, a consistent dream of the Cheyenne & Arapaho throughout their post-treaty unified era.

In a meeting with the president as the contribution was put together in June of that year, one of Hoffman’s close allies later said, Clinton affirmed “something to the effect” of “I’ll see what can be done about it." Hoffman’s friend, Charles Surveyor, later recalled that Clinton fundraiser Terry McAuliffe promised “the president says he[‘s] gonna do something, he’s gonna do it.”

Before too long, after they were dunned by some of the national party people, Hoffman and allies in the Tribes were able to send $87,671.74 – all they had in their bank account. Later, the total contribution reached $107,671.74.  Vice President Al Gore reportedly backed the cause, but a serious hearing on the issue was never held, and today the lands are still in federal hands.

Return of the land never happened.

McAuliffe denied to reporters he had ever made the promise on President Clinton’s behalf.

Senator Fred Thompson, who later led a lengthy investigation of campaign finance, concluded, with some sympathy for the tribes, “We know what was in the minds of the men from the tribe. And that is they thought that they had done themselves some good."

The C&A contribution, and other 1996 issues, became fodder for Thompson’s investigation, and in Congress steps were taken to put mechanisms in place that have thus far prevented return of the land.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. ruled the Tribes’ claim was time barred, even though the tribes entered evidence that legal status of the property had been deemed classified for fifty years after having been placed on standby military status in the 1950s.

The courts have never ruled on the merits of the Cheyenne & Arapaho claim to the former fort – a claim supported in U.S. Interior Department briefs through several administrations, but opposed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which presently controls the land.

Archie Hoffman never stopped advancing the rights of his people. Just a few weeks ago, he appeared before a federal commission, still dreaming, and believing, that one day the Cheyenne & Arapaho will gain justice from the United States.

 

www.CapitolBeatOK.com  

GSA scandal widens

Jim McElhatton, investigative reporter for The Washington Times, has documented that the embattled General Services Administration is facing investigations into as many as 77 conferences and awards ceremonies over the years.

New detail emerged Wednesday about a lavish one-day gathering in Crystal City costing more than a quarter million dollars for hundreds of employees, including a top agency deputy hailed just months ago as a taxpayer hero.

At a congressional hearing into the latest scandal, Rep. John Mica, Florida Republican and chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, said both the GSA’s Office of Inspector General and the House committee are investigating a host of potentially wasteful conferences at the agency, which handles federal contracting and oversees the government’s vast real estate holdings.

The first serious signs of trouble in the agency came to light earlier this year when the GSA became embroiled in a controversy over a more than $800,000 Las Vegas conference featuring clowns, a mind reader and a red carpet party.

A second conference scandal emerged last month when Congress learned from the GSA’s inspector general, Brian Miller, about the one-day, $250,000 conference in Crystal City. The attendees included a GSA deputy administrator, Susan Brita. She was called a hero by one lawmaker for helping to expose the Las Vegas conference.

Details from the Crystal City conference came to light as the GSA told the inspector general that it was about to release information about the event in response to an open-records request. The Washington Times filed a Freedom of Information Act request on the Crystal City event in May. Mr. Miller said his office also received an anonymous tip about the conference in May.

Click here for more from the Washington Times.

Douglas takes reins at OCC

Citing the need for technological innovation, strategic planning, and fighting federal encroachment, Oklahoma Corporation Commissioner Patrice Douglas began service as Commission Chairman Wednesday.  Douglas was elected chairman in a unanimous vote by the Commission last month. Commissioner Dana Murphy served as Chairman previously.

Douglas said her first focus is a strategic plan for the Commission.

“This will be another step forward in our push to increase efficiency and improving our service to those we serve,” Douglas said. “It will better enable us to prioritize and clearly show the taxpayer where every dollar is going and exactly how it’s being used to serve Oklahoma.”

Douglas said another goal is to take advantage of technology.

“Time is key when it comes to efficient regulation that ensures orderly economic development of such sectors as the energy industry while still protecting the environment, public safety, and the consumer,” Douglas said. “With the help of the Oklahoma Energy Secretary, the Oklahoma Energy Resources Board and the Groundwater Protection Council, we’ve been able to equip our oil and gas field inspectors with laptops and portable internet connectivity, making regulation and service in the field much faster and more efficient. But more needs to be done. Some of our computer systems are old and outdated, wasting time and money.”

Douglas said another concern is the push for increased federal regulation of areas that have been under state jurisdiction.

“These moves are being made on several fronts, including energy production and utilities,” Douglas warned. “Much of what has been proposed is needless and could be devastating to the consumer and the economy in general.”

Douglas is an attorney, banker, and former mayor of Edmond. She was appointed to the Commission by Governor Fallin in 2011. She will begin serving her elected term in January, as she is unopposed in the November election.

Among the areas regulated by the Commission are oil and gas drilling and production, public utility rates and services, petroleum storage tanks, filling stations, pipeline safety and trucking.

Calling the Committee

Tulsa Today is the oldest independent online local news service in the world (est.1996) and we are now considering expansion or sale of our name and domain.

Further back in 1985 we first formed to fight abuse of public power under the name “Committee for Clear Communications” which supported publishing of the “Independent Student News” and other print media.  That Committee is now being reconstituted to provide advice and chart a future for Tulsa Today that you, individual readers, are invited to join.

Expansion or sale?

The common culture has splintered by generations and interests.  Americans no longer communicate in the same ways, know or believe the same things, or even utilize the First Amendment for fear of offending political correctness – a tyranny foul in self-imposition.  We have forgotten the foundations of culture necessary for a free people to rule themselves.  We accept obvious lies without challenge and worship fame over wisdom – a superficial substitute promoted by fools counting quantity over quality.

To better reach Tulsa (which we define as the region of economic interest extending throughout Northeast Oklahoma) on issues of substance, we must engage each generation within their multiple circles of interest – where and how they communicate.  To expand as we have come to believe necessary, requires capital.  We don’t have the money – thus, the consideration of sale.  There may be a fit within a traditional media group for Tulsa Today or someone may have the capital to add staff, expand the product in video and work social media as growing opportunity requires.

By the numbers, 25 million pages have been read and Tulsa Today currently hosts between 20 – 30 thousand readers each month.  Not bad for an area of around 800,000 people.  While consistently Conservative, our standard has been to provide a platform for diversity of opinion, in-depth analysis, and news missed by other media.  I’ve won two national awards as a First Amendment Publisher (they didn’t know I was a Conservative at the time), but more important is what we have done together.

Tulsa Today has advocated for and against various tax packages depending on their nature and seen our judgment confirmed more often than not.  Together with our readers, we have encouraged good people to win public office and guided the elected corrupt to prison.  Some stories have legs and gain pervasive community readership, but all begin with a blank page as a writer takes the time to organize facts and what is written doesn’t matter if individuals don’t read and pass it along.

Some call us a blog – usually as an insult, but ok, fine.  In the spirit of full disclosure, this site has never generated sufficient advertising revenue to support the effort.  Tulsa Today has relied primarily on my income from other sources (fully disclosed if relevant) as a writer, communication and public information specialist.  We have paid creative talent for their work, welcomed diverse opinions and published both sides of many disputes – which, in considered opinion, make this a news service.

Tulsa has talent, but why pay them?

There are Conservative writers, editors, photographers, and broadcast talent available to build this platform.  Many of those over the years from Oral Roberts and Tulsa universities contributed here because they love the city and the craft.  But everyone tires, at some point, of working for free.  Without sufficient advertising or donations from readers, Tulsa Today’s pay scale was low.  How long would you labor with little reward?  Can you feed your family on fame?

Government is not one thing.  It is a collection of distinctive power fiefdoms each with multiple layers of labor, management, union and elected official interests.  Consider the old bureaucrat’s joke; “elected officials come and go, but bureaucrats run the show.”  Community advocates and citizen journalists don’t have an elected salary or term so how many meetings would you cover for your fellow citizens?  Would you speak for unpopular issues and endure hateful rebuttal for a just cause … for how long?

Who knows who cares?

On Tuesday July 24 a public meeting in Tulsa discussed “form-based” zoning code.  At issue is the change from “use-based” code.  In a larger context, it can be argued that usage within a particular neighborhood is appropriate for the city to regulate, but the specific look (or form) of a building should be the choice of the owner of the property.  Any restriction that demands compliance and increases costs is a “taking of value” by force of regulation.  The latest change in planning policy first discussed at that meeting notes official plans will no longer be optional, but mandatory within the selected district.  Wow, just when you thought it was a free country.

There was no media coverage of the meeting.  In an exclusive interview with Tulsa Today Monday morning, Dawn Warrick, Director of Planning and Economic Development (salary $122,481 yr.) said sixty people attended (bet that counted her staff of twelve) and officials did not survey the group to find if more or less were supportive of the change or not.  Today, Wednesday August 1st, at 1pm that change could begin to become law at a regular meeting of the Tulsa Planning Commission.

That full interview should be posted soon as a separate story, but consider:
•    Did you know about this meeting?
•    Did you know about the new code in Tulsa?
•    If you did, are you ok with neighborhood groups and bureaucrats telling you what can or cannot be done with your personal real property?
•    Do you think many regular citizens are available to attend the meeting at 1:00 pm?
•    If you are not ok with command and control, are you willing to act before it hits your home or business or does it matter only when the bulldozer is headed up your driveway?

For decades I have covered the most boring meetings in the world.  Specifically, school board meetings where officials fail to use Roberts Rules of Order to call for the question.  I attended a domestic violence taskforce because some members feared others would meet until no one cared.  I recorded and reported the proceedings for months and a better city policy is now in force, but it was not income earning effort.  

There are Trust Fund Babies in Tulsa, but I have no such deep pockets, the Small Business Administration doesn’t finance journalism and wealthy folk mostly fund Leftist Loons (see This Land Press for detail) – which work much better for their cocktail party friends.

I may accept a position with other media or in private industry.  Those employments are not advanced by ownership of media (if perceived as competition) and contentious critics with scandalous slanders are shocking to those not engaged in public debate.  I’ve gotten used to it and agree as Ted Nugent recently said, “If idiots are not attacking you – you might be one.”  But after decades, I would rather work for someone else.

For Tulsa Today, I have maintained an office in the heart of downtown these past dozen years because I really hate the “blogger in mom’s basement” slam other media often utter in condescending tone.  (A video of the office will be posted soon in another story.)  We were here before downtown was cool and helped drive crack dealers off the streets.  I’ve lived in the core of the city, but now I want just a bit of private green space in my daily life.

So what will you do?

The Committee for Clear Communications raised money and contributed time and talents to the long effort, but they never wanted to be in the spotlight.  Thanksgiving Weekend 1985 – while camping at Keystone Lake – I agreed to be the front man, but I will no longer preform that function.  I have been a daily reporter for the now-departed afternoon paper and hosted a radio talk show for a year.  I enjoyed radio because of the direct interaction with the listener, but I may soon have a local television show.

I will still be working to better the community.  In some ways, I may be more impactful if I cease to own a public media.  I will be outspoken on issues of public concern.  I will write.  I am a Conservative Commentator, long active in civic and political groups, but I plan more organizing of individuals than public debates – as plans stand.

I am writing a book and, with employment and family obligations, that is enough.  (Even Paul Revere eventually got off the horse.)  If someone on the Committee will accept the responsibility of publisher, I will help them, but the capital question remains and even with capital, I will not be available here full-time.  With capital; a publisher and staff can be hired and critics shouldn’t over enthuse because the next generation of leadership for Tulsa Today might be even stronger in battle for Faith, Family and Freedom.

The Committee is being called for their opinions and, as a group, to decide by the end of August what should be done with this name and domain.  In short; if you have ever written, worked, contributed, commented, or read Tulsa Today, you are a member of the Committee for Clear Communications and we ask you to check in.  

You may send email to editor@tulsatoday.com or call 918.592.6397 for more detail.  We will gather your opinions, directions and preferences for participation in the future of Tulsa.  I will personally meet with you or groups of you and answer any question posed on media or public policy in Tulsa.

There is a role for Tulsa Today, but the Committee will decide.  Further, while international readers are welcome (if you want to buy locally we can help you), the point has always been local communications – using the Web to connect neighbors.  

To see the best of what coherent Conservative Journalism can do, click here for The Blaze.  To see the best of what should be done on television, click here for GBTV.  If you attended “Restoring Love” in Dallas last weekend I would like to interview you on your perspectives of that event.

Both mentioned media properties are owned by Glenn Beck which I greatly admire, but like so many, his success is focused nationally.  It is an old saying that “all politics are local,” but if that little line is true – I ask how much more then is all media local.  To reboot honest non-Marxist media, in my opinion, we must build local media nationwide.  Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Michael Savage are great at what they do, but none focus local.

There are now some things I no longer wish to publish, but rather to communicate directly with like-minded people.  I agree with Beck that we must activate to earn a more effective, principled and honorable government – from the ground up.  I have some ideas on that subject that I am looking to launch.

Tulsa Today will continue regular publishing until the end of August and there are several feature stories to finish and post.  Together readers and staff have proven here that Internet publishing is not a computer thing, but a communications thing and continuing to evolve.  What Tulsa Today becomes is up to you.  When the afternoon daily paper departed: Tulsans had no chance to help save it.  This is your chance to own a local media in large or small part. 

In short, we get the local media we deserve directly or indirectly by our support of advertising, subscription or donation so what will you support?   Shall we talk more?  Will you act today for Tulsa?  As for me, I am leaving the future of Tulsa Today to Divine Providence and you.

Call or write or use the contact form at the top of each page now for more detail or to schedule a meeting during August.  I hope to talk with you soon.

 

White House busted

President Obama’s White House Staff has issued an embarrassing apology to Charles Krauthammer over the Churchill bust gaffe. 

Nile Gardiner writes in the Telegraph, “the Obama presidency is fond of issuing apologies for America on the world stage, but very rarely makes them at home to Americans.

White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer has just issued one to Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer, who last week wrote an op-ed berating the Obama administration for removing a bust of Sir Winston Churchill from the Oval Office when it came to power. Pfeiffer had issued a stinging attack on Krauthammer, alleging that his Churchill bust reference was “100 percent false.” Krauthammer was of course 100 percent correct, and the British Embassy in Washington even issued a statement contradicting Pfeifer’s remarks.

Click here for the full text of Pfeiffer’s mea culpa, published on the White House blog in the form of an open letter to Mr. Krauthammer from the Telegraph and additional context and commentary on the dispute.