Author Archives: Admin

Kidnapper arrested

Tuesday, 11 August 2009
OKLAHOMA CITY–James E. Finch, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Oklahoma, announced the arrest of Terrance Lynn McGuire related to the January 18, 2007 kidnaping of a 10 year-old girl from Texhoma, Oklahoma earlier this week.

At approximately 6:30 p.m. on January 18, 2007, an unidentified individual lured a 10 year-old girl into a vehicle in Texhoma, Oklahoma.

During the early afternoon on January 19, 2007, the suspect drove to a convenience store in Clovis, New Mexico, where he released the victim. She notified store employees who immediately called authorities.

Based on a recent tip provided to the FBI, Terrance Lynn McGuire, 27, of Canyon, Texas, was identified as the suspect in the kidnaping.

McGuire was charged per a sealed Criminal Complaint filed on August 5, 2009, in the Western District of Oklahoma. McGuire was charged with violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1201(a)(1), Kidnaping.

McGuire was arrested without incident at approximately 8:30 a.m. this morning in Canyon, Texas, by the FBI and Canyon Police Department.

The investigation is being conducted by the FBI, Texas County Sheriff’s Office, Texhoma Police Department, Texas County District Attorney’s Office, Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Guymon Police Department, Oklahoma Highway Patrol, and Clovis Police Department.

The case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of Oklahoma.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 11 August 2009 )

Ballet helps to showcase Tulsa’s economic expansion

Tuesday, 11 August 2009
TULSA, Okla., Aug. 10 — The City of Tulsa, Tulsa Metro Chamber, the Oklahoma Department of Commerce and the Oklahoma Business Roundtable have partnered to help sponsor a Tulsa Ballet performance in New York City during the company’s "Big Apple Tour," marking its first New York performance in 25 years.

"This is a premier opportunity to showcase Tulsa’s arts and economic development prospects to the cultural and commerce center of America," said Mayor Kathy Taylor, city of Tulsa.

Utilizing Mayor Taylor, Gov. Brad Henry and First Lady Kim Henry as hosts, the groups are hosting a reception following the opening performance for site-location consultants and executives of headquarters based in New York City.

"We are showcasing our internationally-known Tulsa Ballet to corporate representatives who advise executives on the best cities for placing new facilities and holding events," said Taylor.

"When we meet with site-selection consultants, we are furthering our goals to attract a quality workforce and jobs to Tulsa. It creates new opportunities for our citizens, city and our local and regional economy."

Attendees of the event include representatives from nine New York-based companies.

President and CEO of the Tulsa Metro Chamber says economic development is not simply about data, but also about building relationships.

"The entire nation is looking at Tulsa. The Tulsa region has one of the lowest costs of doing business in the nation, a low cost of living and a high per capita income. We’ve been selected as the number one location in America to relocate and during this U.S. recession, now more than ever, it is important to capitalize on opportunities to tell our story," said Neal.

"This event will not only change perceptions of the Tulsa region, but grow interest. It’s a new era of economic development, and together with partners like Oklahoma Department of Commerce, the Chamber is making sure the nation knows we are open for business."

Tulsa Ballet will present seven performances at New York City’s Joyce Theater – the only theater in the Big Apple devoted entirely to dance – Aug. 10-15. The last time the company performed in New York was 1983.

The New Yorker magazine promoted the event and reported, "for regional ballet companies, a season at the Joyce is a rite of passage and recognition of success."

For its return engagement, Tulsa Ballet will perform three works that are relatively recent additions to the company’s repertoire: Sir Kenneth MacMillan’s "Elite Syncopations," which the company performed for the first time in March; Nacho Duato’s "Por vos Muero," which was part of the 2006-2007 season; and "This Is Your Life," Young Soon Hue’s creation for Tulsa Ballet that premiered as part of the 2008 "About Tango" program.

Last Updated ( Friday, 21 August 2009 )

Congressional votes for Aug. 7th

WASHINGTON– Here’s a look at how area members of Congress voted over the previous week (Aug. 3-7).

House Vote 1:
HOUSE PASSES CASH-FOR-CLUNKERS:

The House approved $2 billion for the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Program (H.R. 3435), sponsored by Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., to fund the Cash for Clunkers program.

Proponents said that "consumers have spoken with their wallets, and they are saying they like this program" and that the extra funding was needed to aid sluggish car sales in the economic downturn.
Opponents called the bill "an extension of a program that has the government picking winners and losers" and said it was one more step in enshrining the U.S. as a ‘bailout Nation’.

The vote, on July 31, was 316 yeas to 109 nays. YEAS: Rep. Dan Boren D-OK (2nd)
NAYS: Rep. Tom Cole R-OK (4th), Rep. Mary Fallin R-OK (5th), Rep. Frank D. Lucas R-OK (3rd), Rep. John Sullivan R-OK (1st)

House Vote 2:
FINANCIAL FIRMS BONUSES

The House approved an amendment sponsored by Rep.
Barney Frank, D-Mass., to the Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation
Fairness Act (H.R. 3269), to protect recipients of pay bonuses from having to
return their money.

Proponents said the amendment gives "some protection against arbitrary return of bonuses" and that Congress shouldn’t allow for retroactive changes to contracts. Opponents said the amendment would allow the Securities and Exchange Commission "to dictate pay to publicly held companies."

The vote, on July 31, was 242 yeas to 178 nays.
NAYS: Rep. Dan Boren D-OK (2nd), Rep. Tom Cole R-OK (4th), Rep. Mary Fallin R-OK (5th), Rep. Frank D. Lucas R-OK (3rd), Rep. John Sullivan R-OK (1st)

House Vote 3:
COMPENSATION AT CORPORATE FINANCIAL FIRMS: The House approved the Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act (H.R. 3269), sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., to provide for an advisory vote by shareholders on executive compensation and to regulate compensation levels.

Proponents said the bill sought to prevent the practice of awarding bonuses based on business risks.

Opponents said "this bill continues the Democrat majority’s tendency to go to
the default solution for every problem: create a government bureaucracy to make decisions better left to private citizens and private corporations."

The vote, on July 31, was 237 yeas to 185 nays. NAYS: Rep. Dan Boren D-OK (2nd), Rep. Tom Cole R-OK (4th), Rep. Mary Fallin R-OK (5th), Rep. Frank D. Lucas R-OK (3rd), Rep. John Sullivan R-OK (1st)

SENATE VOTES:

Senate Vote 1:
GRANTS FOR RURAL POWER PROJECTS: The Senate rejected an amendment sponsored by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Appropriations Act (H.R. 2997) that would have eliminated funding for the Agriculture Department’s High Energy Cost Grant Program.

Proponents said the amendment would eliminate a duplicative, unnecessary program whose goals are achieved more effectively by a loan program at the Rural Utilities Service.

Opponents said the High Energy Cost Grant Program was effective because it allowed for the replacement of older or failing transmission and distribution lines, developed renewable generation and allowed for rural areas to have energy at a more affordable cost.

The vote, on Aug. 3, was 41 yeas to 55 nays. YEAS: Sen. Tom Coburn R-OK, Sen. James M. Inhofe R-OK

Senate Vote 2:
SENATE PASSES CASH-FOR-CLUNKERS: The Senate passed the CAR Save Program

Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R. 3435) sponsored by Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., that set $2 billion supplemental appropriations for the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save program for fiscal 2009. Proponents called the CAR Save program, known commonly as Cash for Clunkers, "wildly popular" and noted that the $1 billion allowed for under the program originally was nearly exhausted.

Opponents noted that while the goals of the program, to boost the economy, were worthy, the $2 billion could have been returned to taxpayers to do the same thing.

The vote, on Aug. 6, was 60 yeas to 37 nays.  NAYS: Sen. Tom Coburn R-OK, Sen. James M. Inhofe R-OK

REVIEW: Food, Inc.

REVIEW: Food, Inc.
United States, 2009
Directed By: Robert Kenner
Written By: Robert Kenner
Starring: Eric Schlosser, Michael Pollan
Running Time: 94 minutes
Rated PG for some thematic material and disturbing images
(4 ½ out of 5 stars)

A personal note about myself: I spent a year and a half of my life as a full vegetarian. I don’t like talking about it, for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that every time I mentioned it, someone would immediately demand to know “Why!?”

Everyone had different reasons for asking: sometimes they were genuinely curious and wanted to get to know me better; sometimes they were eighth-generation beef-farming Republicans who felt the need to refute every opinion I had; sometimes they were crazy hippies eagerly hoping that I would join whatever flavor-of-the-month protest they were planning.
But regardless, it was a question I quickly tired of answering. I shouldn’t have to justify my personal choices to everyone I meet on the street.

But, since I know you’re all waiting for me to tell you why, I can tell you in three words (though I’m afraid they’ll seem terribly unoriginal): Fast Food Nation, the damning exposé of the food industry published by Eric Schlosser in 2001. Or, more accurately, a review of it.

In fact, I can still pinpoint the single sentence in the review that pushed me into veggie-dom: “The problem starts, to oversimplify a tad, when cattle are fed excrement, the corpses of dead cats and dogs, and animal blood.”

I was in high school at the time, and frankly, had never thought particularly hard about where my food was coming from before that moment (I had been far too busy establishing my identity, so that the adult world could crush it a few years later).

That sentence was enough to get me to give up meat — and give it up hard — for a long time.

I eventually “came around” for a number of reasons (I have a lean, muscular build that requires a lot of protein; I realized that being choosy about my food was essentially First-World elitism; I couldn’t reconcile rejection of certain types of food with my religious convictions; etc.; etc.), and in a sense, I consider the “veggie” chapter of my life to be closed.

But, in a much more accurate sense, the vegetarian identity has been subsumed and incorporated into (what I’d like to think of as) a more mature, developed me — and one that’s hopefully able to see a bit more nuance in the world.

I reacted to the aforementioned book review with disgust and revulsion; it wasn’t until my freshman year of college — after I had given up the diet — that I finally got around to reading Schlosser’s book in its entirety, and my reaction then was something different: anger, pathos.

These were problems, but not the kind that I could simply run away from; after all, the only reason to be aware of problems is so that we can work to effect change. Whether you like it or not, once Charlton Heston finishes shouting “Soylent Green is people!”, someone in the crowd has to respond with “Perhaps, but we all still need to eat.”

That is what, I hope, filmgoers will take home from Food, Inc., a new, similarly-themed documentary from Robert Kenner. Kenner interviews Schlosser extensively for the film, and his intention is a similar one: to throw back the iron curtain protecting the food industry from public scrutiny.

For anyone who doesn’t know, the factory farms and processing plants that produce most of our food are ugly, dirty, and dangerous places where both animals and people are routinely abused, and they’re all owned by an oligopoly of ruthless corporations who have the U.S. government nestled quite comfortably in their pocket.

Their stranglehold on the market has produced some of the cheapest food the world has ever seen — but it’s food with a “hidden” price tag that takes an enormous toll on our environment, our health, and our society.

Kenner’s documentary is an unblinking look at these realities, heavy on facts and broad in scope.

His pace can be dizzying at times as he jumps from the grocery store to the farm to the feedlot to the halls of Congress, but this ultimately proves necessary as his goal is to educate the American public — a public that has been trained by the fast food industry to demand everything quickly and cheaply — about realities that many of them would rather not know about. The film is a brisk 90 minutes, and in this time we see all of the following (and more):

The insides of a plant that produces “ammoniated meat product,” which is claimed to be a component of 75% of the hamburger patties on the market; Seed and chemical company Monsanto’s quest to sue their own customers into oblivion; The meat processing industry’s active and deliberate hiring of illegal immigrants, while the authorities turn a blind eye in exchange for a few token arrests; The insides of a modern chicken coop, where the air is nearly unbreathable and the prematurely fat chickens hobble around on nearly useless legs; Barbara Kowalcyk, activist and mother of a two-year-old child who died from eating a contaminated Jack in the Box hamburger.

It’s moments like the last one in particular that make the film seem, on its surface, a bit emotionally manipulative; but on the other hand, you can’t argue with facts.

Children die from food poisoning every year, and putting a human face on it is hardly an underhanded tactic.

At the same time, though, it’s hard to deny that Food, Inc. tends to aim for, if you’ll pardon the expression, the gut — attempting to disgust you first and make you think second.

It also comes across as a bit one-sided. Part of this is admittedly not its fault — as is acknowledged on-screen throughout, nearly all of the food companies being criticized declined to comment.

Part of the blame, however, rests squarely on Kenner’s shoulders. He’s determined to push organic farming, and in so doing, he glosses over some of the organic movement’s more glaring problems.

For instance: that the runoff from fields of organic crops is often as bad as the runoff from feedlots. Or that organic food is often trucked farther than conventionally farmed food, thus giving it an even bigger carbon footprint.

Or that there’s never been any evidence that organic food is any more nutritious. Or that if all the world’s farming operations were converted to organic methods, more than two billion people would starve, right off the bat.

But, as I’ve said, I’ve been pondering these questions for a long time, and there was definitely a time in my life when I thought the way Kenner does.

However, if we’re truly going to solve the world’s food problems, it will be a long, arduous process with no easy answer (much like it will be to solve the world’s energy and healthcare problems — for whatever that’s worth).

The “solution,” if I can use so crass a term, is undoubtedly going to be a myriad of small solutions, which we’ll have to enact, as a species, one step at a time.

Discovering and enacting solutions must begin with fact-finding and debate — and these are the very things that the food industry wants to silence.

This is where Food, Inc.’s importance lies. Kenner has said in interviews that he spent a large chunk of his production budget fighting legal actions by the food companies that wanted to silence him, and he even reports in the film that the state of Colorado is considering legislation that would make it a felony to publish a photo of a feedlot(!!!).

When this sort of might-makes-right censorship is being imposed, films like Food, Inc. (and books like Fast Food Nation) are both miracles and necessities.

After all, food is quite literally what the human body is made of; if people don’t have the right to know what materials they’re using to build their own bodies, then exactly what rights do they have?

In a sense, Food hasn’t earned the four-and-a-half star rating I’ve given it, but in this case, its sheer importance trumps whatever quibbles I might have with its form and content.

To a degree, it’s light on sustainable answers, but it ends with one nearly everyone can get behind: “If you say grace, ask for food that will be healthy for us and our environment.” Well, amen.

Luke Harrington is a film critic, editor for MovieZeal.com, freelance writer and English major extraordinaire who currently resides in Tulsa. Contact him at luke.t.harrington@gmail.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 12 August 2009 )

Economic health of Green County and sister regions

The heart of Green Country, Tulsa, boasts of being ranked the No.1 place to live by Relocate America.

This list of top 100 places to live is compiled on the basis of housing markets, local economy, and recreational and cultural activities that determine decisions of  house buyers as well as sellers.
For the region, this has become a great selling point.

It is important for Tulsans to comprehend the numerous factors behind such rankings as the performance of Tulsa’s local economy in recent times has exceeded general expectations of people.

In the past five to seven years, the local economy had done better than the state of Oklahoma and the nation as a whole.

A comparison can be made between Tulsa MSA (metropolitan statistical area) and similar size MSAs with comparable populations.

Across the country, Dayton (OH), Albany(NY), Fresno (CA), Albuquerque (NM) and Honolulu (HI) have comparable population numbers (between 837,000 and 917,000) as Tulsa.

Therefore, these regions may be considered as ‘sister regions’ as far as population goes.

These regions may vary as far as their labor force characteristics and work culture are concerned.  Nevertheless, as the classical economists like to phrase ‘with everything else being constant or equal,’ what follows is an interesting as well as insightful comparison of the economic health of these regions.

Here’s a look at the annual percentage change in total employment and personal income between 2001 and 2007 for these regions.

Tulsa MSA experienced a 41 percent increase in personal income and a 7 percent increase in total employment as against 34 percent and 9 percent in case of the whole nation.  Tulsa MSA also outperformed all its sister regions and stood strong in comparison to the state’s numbers.

Another benchmark comparison is between the GDP# growth rates.  Tulsa’s annual GDP growth rates have constantly been higher than that of the US since the middle of 2003.

More surprisingly, Oklahoma City’s growth rates experienced a steep fall between 2004 and 2005 exactly at the time when Tulsa experienced a steep rise. Here again, we see that Tulsa outperforms all its sister regions.

Local unemployment rates have consistently been the lowest in Tulsa among the neighboring areas- Lawton and Oklahoma City.  Even when unemployment was shooting up nationally during 2007 and 2008, Tulsa maintained its lowest unemployment rates in almost five years.

All of these above are economic factors that contribute to the attractiveness of a region.  Besides, Tulsa is home to the performing arts center, ballet and arenas that host a multitude of shows that attract tourists from nearby regions.

It is all these factors combined with the overall quality of life that contributes to Tulsa being the No.1 place to relocate.

This also points to the fact our local region has not been as adversely impacted by the current economic times.

This year our economy has seen the worst financial times since the Great Depression of the 1930s.  Government is floating stimulus money to all states.  There are two categories of the federal Government spending:

1. Social spending that includes spending on

– Education
– Housing and Urban Development
– Health
– Crime Fighting
– Job Training
– Arts
– Food and Farming

2. Infrastructure spending that includes spending on

– Transportation
– Water
– Energy
– Military
– Veteran Spending
– Government
– Outdoors
– Emergency Shelters

The largest portion of the federal stimulus money is expected to go towards education and transportation ($113.6 billion).  The second largest portion will be spent on housing and urban development, health and energy ($55.0 billion).

The state of Oklahoma will receive about $2.35 billion in Government stimulus money.  About 62 percent of this money will be spent on education and transportation while 19 percent will be spent in the health care and energy sectors.

A lot is going on in the energy sector and it is encouraging to see money being invested into higher education for training aspiring technicians and engineers in this sector.

Recently, the Oklahoma Department of Commerce was awarded $400,000 from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a wind technician safety curriculum to be designed and implemented with the Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education and the Oklahoma Regents for Higher Education.

The Department of Energy report says "Oklahoma has the potential to become the second-largest wind energy producer, providing almost 10 percent of the nation’s electricity needs by 2030."

The Department of Commerce expects the state’s emerging wind industry to create 7,000 jobs over the next five years and up to 18,000 jobs within 10 years, with a significant portion of them occurring in Oklahoma’s advanced manufacturing sector.

This size of direct spending in the region will not only create direct jobs but also a substantial number of indirect jobs, and increased household earnings.

Every dollar spent has a ripple effect on the economy not just within the impacted region but also on the neighboring regions.

When new jobs are created a region’s attractiveness increases manifold and subsequently new businesses start looking at it as a place of destination.

Business interactions, as we know, transverse regional and economic boundaries.

It remains to be seen how Green Country will benefit from this spending and also whether or not the spending areas have been targeted precisely.

Only time will tell.

An economic impact analysis of this spending could be performed, but at the moment it is beyond the scope of this article.

Nevertheless, it is a topic of future research and this series of articles may address it in subsequent issues.

About the author
The author welcomes comments and suggestions on the article as well as requests for topics for future articles.  The author may be contacted at ananta.kirikera@gmail.com.

Learn more about Ananta by reading her biography.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 12 August 2009 )