Author Archives: Admin

Dr. Coburn on “Non-Defense” defense spending

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) last week released an oversight report, “Department of Everything.” The report outlines how DOD can save $67.9 billion over ten years by making specific cuts to what Dr. Coburn describes as “non-defense” defense spending – spending that DOD can cut without cutting vital defense priorities.  

“I believe in peace through strength but we cannot be strong militarily unless we are strong economically.  And we cannot be strong economically if we treat politically-sensitive areas of the budget as sacrosanct. 

"At a time when our own military leaders are calling our debt our greatest national security threat we need to look at every area of the budget for potential savings.  No part of the budget can be taken off the table.  Achieving peace through strength, and getting our debt under control, must involve refocusing the Pentagon on its core mission,” said Dr. Coburn.   

“I prepared this report because the American people expect the Pentagon’s $600 billion annual budget to go toward our nation’s defense,” Dr. Coburn added.  “That isn’t happening.  Billions of defense dollars are being spent on programs and missions that have little or nothing to do with national security, or are already being performed by other government agencies.  Spending more on grocery stores than guns doesn’t make any sense. And using defense dollars to run microbreweries, study Twitter slang, create beef jerky, or examine Star Trek does nothing to defend our nation.”

The $67.9 billion in savings in the “Department of Everything” report could pay for a third of the cost of the planned fleet of new strategic bombers for the Air Force.  It could, likewise, pay a third of the cost of the fleet of Ohio-class replacement nuclear submarines for the Navy.  For the Army, $16 billion over ten years – about 25 percent of the savings in the report – could mean robust funding for modernization or purchase of new rifles and light machine guns for every soldier.

Five areas in DOD highlighted in the report that have little to do with defense include:

•    Non-Military Research and Development ($6 billion)
•    Education ($15.2 billion)
•    Alternative Energy ($700 million)
•    Grocery Stores ($9 billion)  
•    Overhead, Support and Supply Services ($37 billion)

In addition, the report found:

•    Pentagon-branded beef jerky (p. 22);
•    A reality cooking show called Grill it Safe featuring two “Grill Sergeants” who performed a 46-minute cooking video (p. 8);
•    Pentagon-run microbreweries (p. 8);
•    A smart phone app to alert users when to take a coffee break (p. 20);
•    A bomb detector less effective than “a coin flip” (p. 15);
•    Research examining the social interaction between robots and babies (p. 31);
•    A workshop asking “Did Jesus die for Klingons too?” (p. 16);
•    More flag officers per troop than at the height of the Cold War (p. 69)
•    DOD overhead expenses greater than Israel’s GDP (p. 69)

To read the full report, click here.

Mullet Over #534

Phobatrivaphobia is the fear of trivia about phobias.
Psueudophobatriviaphobia would be the fake fear of trivia about phobias –
not a common affliction.

The Confederation Bridge (8 miles long) connects Prince Edward Island to mainland Canada (New Brunswick). Folks in cars can ride to the island and cross the Confederation Bridge free of any fees. Likewise, people can have their automobiles transported to Prince Edward Island using the available ferries and pay nothing. However, when leaving, it costs $45 per car to use the bridge and $67 (depending on American/Canadian exchange rates) to use the ferries. One can walk back over the bridge for a mere $4.50.

OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) is made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela. Of course the organization is headquartered in Austria.

The state of Maine is bordered by only one U.S. state: New Hampshire.

Food intended for human consumption is commonly sterilized by four methods: Extreme pressure (at least 100,000 PSI), high temperature (252 degrees Fahrenheit), dehydration (Water Activity below .85) and high acidity (less than 4.6 PH). Foods kept sterile can remain free of bacterial contamination for decades. However, it is claimed by food-testers that the taste-quality of foods thusly sterilized often suffers significantly.

During the years 1918 & 1919, more people died from influenza infections than from all military actions during World War I (1914-1918).

Buttons have been around for about 5,000 years. However, all indications are that early buttons were for decorative purposes only. It was not until the 1200’s that some clever haberdasher decided that a button might make a great clothes-fastening apparatus. Pins and buckles were the clothes-fastening devices of choice prior to the “button” era.

Medical research has shown that most people’s hair grows at a measurably slower pace as they edge past the age of forty. Similar studies reveal that the cutting/shaving of hair has no effect on the growth rates of flexible protein strands (hair).

Koala fingerprints are remarkably similar to human fingerprints.

The American and the Pacific tectonic plates meet along a line known as the San Andreas Fault. This line of intense geological stress runs about 650 miles through California. Some horrible earthquakes have occurred in the fault regions and sadly, scientists predict that more quakes are extremely likely.

Well, keep those new-fangled buttons straight – and have a great week.

Over 60 Gazan rockets fired, 19 intercepted

The Jerusalem Post reports eight rockets were fired at Ashkelon from Gaza on Monday afternoon. Two of the rockets hit the city, one hitting a house directly and the other hitting a yard. No injuries were reported, but three people were treated for shock, Magen David Adom paramedics said.

The Iron Dome system intercepted over 19 rockets fired into southern Israel from the Gaza Strip Monday. Over 60 rockets struck Ashkelon, Ashdod, Beersheba, Sderot and other areas of the South.

A rocket fired by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip hit a school parking lot in Ashkelon on Monday morning, causing damage to a building but no injuries.

The Iron Dome rocket-defense system intercepted seven rockets fired at Ashkelon and Ashdod and another launched toward Beersheba. One rocket exploded in an open field outside of Beersheba.  Earlier Monday, rockets landed in open fields outside Eshkol and Sha’ar Hanegev, causing no injuries or damage, Army Radio reported.

Israeli strikes in Gaza killed at least ten civilians and two Islamic Jihad field commanders overnight Sunday, Palestinian sources reported. One of the strikes hit a police station in Gaza City. The IDF also hit over 80 targets in the Gaza Strip overnight Sunday, including rocket launchers, tunnels, training camps, weapons caches and terror cells that fired on Israel in recent days, bringing the total of targets to 1,350 since the start of Operation Pillar of Defense on Wednesday.

The morning rocket was the first since a house near Kiryat Malachi was struck late on Sunday evening.

A witness on the scene, Gal Goldberg, 17, described the blast as the rocket landed on the home next door to his own, "When we heard the siren we entered a safe room, the blast shook the walls, we went outside and saw people running towards the house that was hit. We saw widespread wreckage," Goldberg said.

Hamas fired its most intense rocket salvos yet on southern Israel on Sunday, as it and other terrorist factions launched 120 rockets into Israel Sunday, including two Fajr-5 missiles at Tel Aviv on Sunday evening. Both were intercepted over the Dan region.

The IAF struck over 120 targets in Gaza, and targeted senior operational Hamas terrorists orchestrating attacks on Israeli communities.

Ashkelon came under heavy rocket attack on Sunday morning, with four rockets scoring direct hits. Terrified residents sought cover as rockets hit apartment buildings. A Palestinian rocket seriously injured a man in the Sha’ar Hanegev region. Paramedics rushed him to the hospital.  Five civilians traveling in a vehicle in Ofakim were injured – one seriously – by shrapnel from a rocket.

Magen David Adom said its paramedics treated 40 wounded people on Sunday, including seven people hurt by shrapnel.

MDA also treated 31 people suffering from shock, including six in Tel Aviv following rocket fire toward the city.

“Rocket attacks on Israel continue, but their ability to launch rockets is decreasing,” IDF Spokesman Brig.-Gen. Yoav Mordechai said.

“Hamas is using the Palestinian population as a human shield. We have released footage of rocket fire from a mosque courtyard, prayer houses, public places and homes,” Mordechai added. “Many of their rockets are falling inside the Gaza Strip.”

Click here for more from The Jerusalem Post.

The Blaze is reporting a dead boy used by Hamas for propaganda was killed by Hamas rocket.

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil cried on Friday and kissed the dead child’s forehead, calling him a “martyr.” CNN called him “another victim of an [Israeli] airstrike.” Newspapers showed his photo as an example of the Palestinian civilians killed by Israel’s ongoing military campaign against militants in Gaza.

The only problem with that narrative is that 4-year-old Mahmoud Sadallah was killed by a Hamas rocket that fell short in Gaza instead of its intended target: Israel. According to an Israeli military statement Sunday, “Ninety-nine rockets fired from Gaza have crashed back into Gaza in the last four days. Hamas fires from civilian areas…and hits its own people.”

Pro-Israel blogger Elder of Ziyon reviewed media reports on the incident and wrote: “The IDF did not launch any airstrikes in Gaza while Egyptian PM Kandil was in Gaza.” Israel had agreed to a temporary ceasefire while Kandil was visiting Gaza on Friday, as a gesture to Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi. Even so, terror groups continued firing on Israel during the diplomatic visit.

Content warning — graphic photo — click here for more from The Blaze.

Lankford elected Republican Policy Chair for 113th Congress

Washington, D.C. — Representative James Lankford (R-OK) was elected today as Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee for the 113th Congress.   
 
"As a Conference of ideas, engaging our membership is key to exploring all principled solutions to the problems facing our nation,” Lankford said. “Gathering smart policy solutions from all members is critical for reforming our unmanageable tax code, creating long-term employment opportunities, reducing our crippling debt and revitalizing the stagnate economy. 

“The families in my home district in Oklahoma have commonsense solutions to resolve the issues of our day. Their ideas and the ideas from around the nation must continue to be represented at the leadership table and in the policy meetings of Congress. 
 
“Chairman Price earned due praise for his leadership of the Policy Committee over the past two years. Going forward, we must maintain positive momentum and fresh perspectives while serving our constituents and our nation. I look forward to meeting with our newly elected leadership team and my colleagues in the House to continue to discuss ways to build on the significant work we’ve already accomplished,” Lankford concluded.

The Republican Policy Committee Chairman is an integral role within GOP Conference leadership, following the Speaker of the House, Majority Leader, Majority Whip and Republican Conference Chair. The Policy Committee Chair affords its occupant a significant voice in formulating and promoting House GOP policy as well as a seat at the leadership table, while the Congress addresses our nation’s many pressing needs.   

Social Science helped push Obama’s re-election

Analysis:  One persistently interesting story that has emerged since the wrap-up of this fall’s campaign by President Barack Obama is the story of how the Obama campaign’s operations were dictated not by liberal ideology but by a process consumed with data and an attempt to scientifically boost turnout.

Conservatives sneered at this approach prior to the election for its attempt to obviate human free will as a factor. Now that it has worked, Republican consultants are probably combing through the strategy to see how to replicate it on their side. And one particularly interesting area where this data-driven approach appears to have been not only used, but pushed further than anyone had before, can be seen in an article by the New York Times explaining the campaign’s consultation with scientists studying behavioral economics.

Behavioral economics is a relatively new field of economic analysis that blends insights from psychology and neuroscience with econometric equations to model how human beings make their decisions. It has gained special currency on the Left because many liberals see its conclusions as contradicting the presumption by classical economists that every decision is “rational.” That this is a straw man of the economic definition of “rationality” does not appear to phase these would-be critics.

However, despite its currency on the Left, behavioral economics leans neither direction (though many authors, such as Cass Sunstein, have sought to apply its insights to government), as it is focused exclusively on understanding human decision-making processes, and what stimuli are most likely to make people choose particular options. That is where the Obama campaign decided to use it – specifically, to figure out what would motivate people to vote.

From the New York Times article:

In a now classic experiment, a pair of Stanford
psychologists asked people if they would display in a home window a
small card proclaiming the importance of safe driving. Those who agreed
to this small favor were later much more likely to agree to a much
larger favor, to post a large “Drive Carefully” sign on their lawn —
“something no one would agree to do otherwise,” Dr. Cialdini said.

Obama volunteers also asked people if they had a plan to vote and if
not, to make one, specifying a time, according to Stephen Shaw, a
retired cancer researcher who knocked on doors in Nevada and Virginia in
the days before the election. “One thing we’d say is that we know that
when people have a plan, voting goes more smoothly,” he said.[…]

Another technique some volunteers said they used was to inform
supporters that others in their neighborhood were planning to vote.
Again, recent research shows that this kind of message is much more
likely to prompt people to vote than traditional campaign literature
that emphasizes the negative — that many neighbors did not vote and thus
lost an opportunity to make a difference.

Click here for more from The Blaze.