Author Archives: Admin

OID Investigation leads to charges

A former insurance agent in Creek County has been charged with three additional felonies after an investigation by the Oklahoma Insurance Department (OID). Donna Parrick, of Depew, is charged with Exploitation of an Elderly Person, Embezzlement and Violation of the Oklahoma Licensed Producer Act.
 
“As Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner, it’s my job to protect consumers,” said Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John D. Doak. “Our Anti-Fraud Unit will aggressively investigate claims of fraud and go after anyone who tries to take advantage of Oklahoma seniors.”

The most recent charges were filed July 5th. The OID began investigating after receiving a complaint from Cindy Hightower, on behalf of her mother Della Hall, who is 80 years old and on bottled oxygen. Hall bought a homeowners policy from Parrick but never received a copy of the policy, despite several requests. Hightower then called her mother’s insurance company and discovered that the policy didn’t exist. Parrick tried to persuade Hall to keep silent and not report the matter to authorities.
 
Despite the suspension of her license on June 14th, Parrick sent Hall a business letter and a check for $135, which Hall received on June 29th. The business letter claimed an “internal audit” had discovered a “discrepancy” that required a “premium correction” in Hall’s favor. Since Parrick was not allowed to conduct any insurance-related activities under her suspension, OID investigators asked the district attorney to charge Parrick with Violation of the Oklahoma Licensed Producer Act.
 
Parrick was charged with embezzlement in a different case on June 1st. In that case, Parrick took $3,964 from a 77-year-old widow, deposited it in her personal bank account, but never bought the policies to cover the victim’s home and rental properties. A third victim, a 70-year-old woman, said Parrick took $345 from her, but also never purchased the requested coverage.
 
The Oklahoma Insurance Department, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, is responsible for the education and protection of the insurance-buying public and for oversight of the insurance industry in the state.
 

Fed pays living and dead?

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) released the following statement regarding a new report from the Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) that found that SSA failed to properly record the deaths of 1.2 million deceased beneficiaries on the Death Master File, which is exclusively maintained by the agency.[1]

It is inexcusable the federal government can’t determine whether a recipient of federal taxpayer money is alive or dead.  The importance of the Death Master File cannot be overstated.  

Failing to maintain this file costs taxpayers at least $120 million
every year.  Those are dollars we borrow here and overseas to pay dead
people.  That is embarrassing, especially when SSA is overseeing
retirement and disability programs that are going bankrupt.  Congress needs to hold SSA accountable for their breathtaking incompetence,” Dr. Coburn said. 

The impact of SSA’s failure to properly record these deaths is widespread and results in millions of American tax dollars paid to dead people each year.  All federal agencies are currently required to check the DMF to ensure the individuals receiving benefits are alive.  In June 2010, President Obama directed that before the release of any federal funds all agencies were required to check the DMF.[2]  SSA’s failure to maintain an accurate DMF also creates difficulties for the administration’s current effort to develop a “Do Not Pay solution” in response to the President’s directive, which includes all agencies checking a database of information from the DMF before a payment is made to an individual.[3]

The OIG report identified the following specific agencies that provide benefits directly to individuals by relying on the DMF:  Railroad Retirement Board; Department of Defense; Office of Personal Management; Department of Veterans Affairs; and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Therefore, SSA’s failure to properly maintain information on whether an individual is alive or dead touches every payment made by the government.  Past examples of government payments made to dead people include:

•    The Department of Agriculture sent $1.1 billion in farming subsidies to deceased farmers;

•    Medicare paid $92 million in claims for medical supplies prescribed by dead doctors and $8.2 million for medical supplies prescribed for dead patients; and

•    The Department of Health and Human Services sent 11,000 dead people $3.9 million in assistance to pay heating and cooling costs
.[4]

Further exacerbating the problem, SSA allows the Department of Commerce to sell the DMF not only to public entities, but also private companies.  Private entities, such as banks, hospitals, universities, and insurance companies, use the DMF to verify the identity of individuals and prevent fraud.  The same SSA OIG report determined that since 2001, 1,556 dead people earned wages totaling about $158 million.  While some of these could be errors, others potentially involved fraudsters using Social Security numbers of individuals that died up to 31 years ago.[5]

SSA OIG also found the failure to maintain the DMF produced inaccuracies in the E-verify program, which is used by employers to determine if a potential employee is authorized to work.  The audit determined that when an individual’s death is not recorded by SSA in the DMF, E-verify indicated the individual claiming the Social Security number is legally able to work.  As such, individuals who would otherwise be illegal to work can use Social Security numbers of dead people to appear to be legal to work.

In response to the report, Sen. Tom Coburn stated “The importance of the Death Master File cannot be overstated, especially in these bleak economic times with limited tax dollars to go around.  At the bare minimum, the federal government needs to stop sending payments to dead people.  If SSA cannot be trusted to properly and accurately maintain this important information, then Congress should determine if another agency can perform this basic function.”

Sen. Coburn previously called for SSA to improve its management of data on the deceased in October 2010, following the Internal Revenue Service sending $18 million in stimulus checks to 71,688 deceased individuals based on information in the DMF.[6]  In response, Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue responded:  “Absent a report of death, it is extremely expensive and may even be impossible to determine if a person is alive or dead particularly if the person died many years ago.”[7]

[1]   Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General, Title II Deceased Beneficiaries Who Did Not Have Death Information on the Numident, Report A-09-11-21171 (July 9, 2012).
[2]   The White House, Office of the Secretary, Presidential Memorandum – Enhancing Payment Accuracy Through a “Do Not Pay List” (June 18, 2010),http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/presidential-memorandum-enhancing-payment-accuracy-through-a-do-not-pay-list.
[3]   Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (April 12, 2012), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2012/m-12-11.pdf.
[4]   Sen. Coburn previously reported that government agencies paid over $1 billion paid to dead people over a ten year period.  See Sen. Tom Coburn, Federal Programs to Die For:  American Tax Dollars Sent Six Feet Under (October 31, 2010), http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public//index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=406062be-b959-4798-b55e-39029197a9fc.
[5]   Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General, Title II Deceased Beneficiaries Who Did Not Have Death Information on the Numident, Report A-09-11-21171 (July 9, 2012).
[6]   Sen. Tom Coburn, Federal Programs to Die For:  American Tax Dollars Sent Six Feet Under (October 31, 2010), http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public//index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=406062be-b959-4798-b55e-39029197a9fc.
[7]   August 14, 2009 Letter from Social Security Commissioner Michael J. Astrue to Senator Tom Coburn.

Stillwater selected for aerospace manufacturing site

Today Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin and Secretary Dave Lopez of the Oklahoma Department of Commerce, announced that Belgium-based Asco Incorporated will be opening a new U.S. production facility in Stillwater, Oklahoma.

Asco is a technology specialist and world-class provider of supply chain integration in design, development, precision machining, processing, and certified assembly of complex high strength metallic aircraft components. Asco specializes in lift devices, mechanical assemblies and major functional components for the aerospace industry.

“Oklahoma was the best location for our facility, said Christian Boas, CEO Asco Group. “ The state is centrally located in North America and has an existing aerospace industry which is thriving. Oklahoma has a highly skilled workforce which specializes in our industry and the state has offered us assistance in training our new workforce.”

The new Stillwater plant will represent the latest in technology and lean manufacturing practices. The state of the art facility will house machining, heat and surface treatment, and assembly operations for complex machined parts made of titanium, steel and aluminum. With this new comprehensive manufacturing unit in North America, Asco will be prepared to meet the needs of clients and ramp up new and legacy programs.

“I am thrilled to welcome ASCO to the Oklahoma community,” Governor Mary Fallin of Oklahoma said. “Oklahoma has one of the strongest aerospace sectors in the U.S., and we are quickly becoming an international destination for the industry. Today’s announcement is one more indication that our commitment to pro-business policies is helping to attract jobs and businesses to the state. Oklahoma is proud to host ASCO and we look forward to a long and successful partnership with the company and its employees.”

With the support of both a fully equipped American manufacturing unit and a design center in the United States, Asco will strengthen its position as a preferred supplier to its customers.

“We will work closely with Asco to ensure its transition into the Oklahoma market is smooth,” said Dave Lopez, Secretary of Commerce for the Oklahoma Department of Commerce. “Asco will be an excellent addition to our aerospace community.”

“Asco will bring high-quality, highly skilled jobs to the area and add to our vibrant aerospace industry, “ said Lisa Navrkal, President & CEO of the Stillwater Chamber of Commerce. “We’re excited to have another foreign company joining our business community.”

The Stillwater facility capital investment is expected to be $60 million and 250 employees by 2014.  Phase Two is expected to bring an additional $30 million to $40 million in capital investment and an additional 350 jobs in 2015.

Asco, incorporated in 1954, is a proven technology specialist and supply chain integrator in design, development, precision machining, processing, and certified assembly of complex high strength metallic aircraft components (high-lift devices, landing gear components, and engine attachments).  Asco is headquartered in Zaventem, Belgium with operating subsidiaries in Germany and Canada combined with service offices in Brazil, France and the US. Today, the Asco Group employs 1,250 people. Its worldwide, 100% Aerospace customer base includes most aircraft manufacturers as well as many related Tier-1 and Tier-2 suppliers. For more information visit www.asco.be.

Eric Holder’s decades of concealing murder

WesternJournalism.com has published an article by Doug Brook, that information provided to congressional committees by ATF whistle-blowers and leaks within the Department of Justice prove Eric Holder to be either criminally complicit in the Fast and Furious scheme and cover-up, or the most incompetent, congenitally comatose Attorney General in the nation’s history. 

He asserts that though Holder is many things, he is not incompetent, at least not in the willful “execution-upon-command” of illegal and despicable enterprises; especially when those enterprises involve an Administration-generated murder in Oklahoma City of Kenneth Michael Trentadue while in custody of the FBI. 

“You need to know that Eric Holder…played a key role in covering up the torture-murder death of my brother, Kenneth Michael Trentadue.”

This is what Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue wrote in December of 2008 to prospective incoming chairman of the Senate Justice Committee, Patrick Leahy. The newly-elected Barack Obama had made Holder his choice for Attorney General, and Trentadue was going to do everything in his power to stop this shameful appointment going forward.

Kenneth Trentadue was killed in Oklahoma City on August 21st of 1995, four months after the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building. He had been taken into custody by the FBI and placed in an isolation cell at a federal facility in El Reno, Oklahoma.
 
The official government report on the cause of death presented to Trentadue’s family stated that Kenneth hanged himself in his cell. But massive bruises and lacerations from head to toe compelled even the Oklahoma City medical examiner to state “very likely he was murdered.”
 
Using emails and handwritten notes acquired in a 1997 wrongful death lawsuit against the DOJ, Trentadue demonstrated quite conclusively in his correspondence to Patrick Leahy that then-Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder had engineered a scheme to sidetrack any investigation into his brother’s death in order to “…deflect congressional oversight and media attention…”

A fifteen-year investigation by Jesse Trentadue revealed that Eric Holder had covered up the murder of his brother in order to prevent congressional investigators linking the death, and eventually the Clinton Administration itself, to the Oklahoma City bombing. And Holder’s efforts to derail the Fast and Furious probe have made it clear that 20 years have not changed the Attorney General’s propensity for corruption and deceit. For from the aftermath of Oklahoma City to the smuggling of guns across the Mexican border, Eric Holder has callously concealed murders for which two administrations have been responsible.

It’s hardly surprising that Holder’s DOJ minions have decided to not prosecute the Attorney General for the comparatively minor offense of refusing to provide Congress with subpoenaed documents. After all, Eric Holder has gotten away with murder—or at least with being an accessory after the fact—for nearly 2 decades.
 
Of course, Republicans MIGHT decide to charge Eric Holder with his many crimes when the November victory of Mitt Romney places the Department of Justice in GOP hands.  The Party might also bring Barack Obama to justice, both for participation in Fast and Furious and his willful, duplicitous role as Manchurian Candidate.
 
Yes, they might. But then, Holder and Obama might CONFESS too! The one is just as likely as the other.    Click here for the posting on Western Journalism.

Does the First Amendment apply to computers?

Analysis:  Brietbart.com’s Seton Motley recently noted that on December 21, 2010 the Barack Obama Administration–via its Federal Communications Commission (FCC)– illegally imposed Network Neutrality.

Rejected multiple times by Congress; Net Neutrality allows the
government to regulate every website on the World Wide Web–a tremendous
First Amendment free speech problem.

 Net Neutrality came from the fevered mind of Tim Wu.  Wu is a Columbia law professor.  And the former chair of Free Press–the absurdest of all the pro-Net Neutrality Media Marxist groups.  On February 4, 2011 Wu became senior advisor to the (Obama Administration’s) Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for consumer protection and competition issues that affect the Internet and mobile markets.  Wu wants the government to know where we go via GPS, what we write on word processing software and who we Friend on Facebook.

 
When you turn to Google with a question, the search engine must decide, at that moment, what “answers” to give, and in what order to put those answers. If such answers are speech then any government efforts to regulate Google must be examined as censorship….
 
But if we call computerized decisions “speech,” the judiciary must consider these laws as potential censorship, making the First Amendment, for these companies, a formidable anti-regulatory tool.

Wu is absurdly asserting that what you type in the “Search” field is protected speech–but the results you get are not.  The “Search” results being, of course, a dead giveaway as to what you typed in the “Search” field. 

Do you want the government having blanket access to where you go, what you write and for what you search–just because you did any of it on a computer?  Wu does.
 
Click here for more from www.Breitbart.com