Category Archives: Science

The Ethics of Gender Affirmation

The ongoing conversation around gender dysphoria and “gender-affirming care” is deeply concerning, to say the least. Gender dysphoria is defined as a perceived misalignment between one’s biological sex and how they identify. Gender dysphoria has been linked to delusion and psychosis.

Affirming a delusion or false belief is ethically questionable. Those who have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria are encouraged to socially transition and medicalize with cross-sex hormones and irreversible surgeries. Some might argue that they are engaging in self-harm.

Continue reading

Whole Milk Is Back!

Wednesday, President Donald J. Trump signed the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act in the Oval Office alongside U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., USDA National Nutrition Advisor Dr. Ben Carson, dairy farmers, moms, and bipartisan members of Congress to restore access to whole milk in schools and strengthen support for American dairy producers.

Continue reading

Next in Government Spending?

So people will start breathing again as Congress has decided to reopen the government. But let’s look forward to the discussions to be held which will very much impact those people who buy the ACA and subsidies.

Envision a pair of pants with many pockets. The pockets hold the distributed tax dollars in varying amounts. The owner of the pants is taxpayers, but the wearer is simply a robot controlled by all levels of government.

Continue reading

EHT Responds to “Radiation Fears”

The New York Times recently published an article under the headline “Radiation Fears Bring MAHA and MAGA Movements Into Conflict” — a piece which editorializes on the MAHA Report’s seeming consideration of tightening safety for cell phone radiation at the same time that the Trump administration weighs looser regulations for the nuclear industry.

While we at Environmental Health Trust are always encouraged to see serious discussion about the health impacts of wireless radiation, we were disappointed to see several factual errors, omissions, and misrepresentations in the article. We take the opportunity here to address these inaccuracies.

Continue reading